Answer:
a concrete operational thinker
Explanation:
Sam is at the park with his friends. They want to build a seesaw they can use. Every time Sam chooses a board, he moves the stone fulcrum and changes the number of people on the seesaw. Sam is most likely <u>a concrete operational thinker</u>.
In Paigets theory of cognitive development, concrete operational thinking is the third stage and it comprises of children between the ages of 7 to 12 of age. A concrete operational thinker is characterized by logical reasoning and the desire to handle real life situations without being influenced by changes in the prevailing situation. Sam was able to logically think out the position of the fulcrum with the changing load on the board, this logical reasoning is a characteristics of a concrete operational thinker
Szatmary, d. (2010). rockin' in time: a social history of rock-and-roll (9th edition). upper saddle river, new jersey Pearson pdf.
This authoritative text explores topics such as the influence of rock music on the civil rights movement, demographic change, and the baby boom.
Author David Szatmary places rock-and-roll in the context of the social issues that surrounded and shaped it. This authoritative text explores.
Rockin' In Time: A Social History of Rock-and-Roll is a rock history book written by David Szatmary. It was originally published in 1987 and is now in its eighth edition. The book begins with a discussion of the African-American culture and hits and their influences on the creation of rock and roll.
Learn more about Rockin here:-
brainly.com/question/20538428
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Missouri Compromise was struck down as unconstitutional, and slavery and anti-slavery proponents rushed into the territory to vote in favor or against the practice. The rush, effectively led to massacre known as Bleeding Kansas and propelled itself into the very real beginnings of the American Civil War
The experimental units are what you apply the treatments to. In this experiment it would be the subjects or the customers in this situation since they will be treatment (either standing at their regular height or squatting to meet the eye level which could affect the amount of tip they give). An example of randomization can be numbering each table in the restaurant and picking them out of a hat and going to that table that you randomly chose and imposing the treatment on the customers there. Because tips depend on the income of the customers and how much they are willing to give for their meal. If not even income some people are willing to give despite how much money they make so their tips may higher than the wealthy crowd. Other factors the experimenters may not be able to control is the mood of the customers as well isn't it more likely if someone is enjoying their time to give more to the server despite the service the waiter.
Answer:
the answer is just dfvgbhnjnhgtfrdefrgj
Explanation:
because thats all you said
