<span>It is like he is addicted to it, and he tries to get away from it, but he can't and he knows that even though it is hard, he will grow and learn something from it.
If we see this in biological view, something that attract our curiousity tend to release chemical in our brain that make us drawn to it even though we may be aware about the danger or negative effects of that thing</span>
A statistically significant result indicates that your findings are not likely due to chancea statistically significant result indicates that your findings are not likely due to chance.this is a true statement.
Statistical significance provides a cut-off value for determining whether a sample's results and observable effects are primarily due to screening and accurately represent the characteristics of the study population.This significance threshold is often 0.05-5%, regardless of the need for documentation. This is because the implications of our findings recognize the importance of both Type I and Type II errors. When we say that a result is "statistically significant", we mean it is statistically significantly different from 0.
There is usually a null hypothesis that the parameter is equal to zero. Through statistical analysis, tests can be performed to prove that such parameters are statistically significantly different from zero. Therefore, you should know that this value is statistically significantly different from 0 when viewed in text.
Learn more about statistical significance here:
brainly.com/question/15848236
#SPJ4
Answer:
d.pure monopoly
Explanation:
Monopoly is a term used in economics to refer to a company or business organization that has little or no competition and so is at a better position to exploit the public at will as they are in control of price and at a better bargaining power. There is hardly any need for marketing or promotion under monopoly. This is demonstrated by Turkmen Telecom which has absolute monopoly as they are the only business in that market
Answer: the rest helped encoding
Explanation:
The participants who carried out the waking rest could perform better because of they took out time to rest, where as the other group couldn't perform well because they've not rested.
the supreme court does not have terms
