Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
Answer:
D. The sequence diverges by oscillation.
Step-by-step explanation:
an = (-1.00000004)n
From root test
L = Lim n->infinity (|an|)(1/n)
==> L = Lim n->infinity (|-1.00000004n|)(1/n)
==> L = Lim n->infinity (|-1.00000004|n)(1/n)
==> L = Lim n->infinity |-1.00000004|
==> L = 1.00000004 > 1
Hence series diverges.
136 is a composite number.
136 = 1 x 136,
2 x 68,
4 x 34
or 8 x 17
. Factors of 136: 1, 2, 4, 8, 17, 34, 68, 136.
Prime factorization: 136 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 17, which can also be written 136 = 2³ x 17.
When we round a number the new rounded <span>number is </span>simpler but the value is kept close to what it was. The common method for rounding numbers is the following: we d<span><span>ecide which is the last digit to keep and l</span><span>eave this digit the same the same if the next digit is less than 5 or increase it by 1 if the next digit is bigger than 5.
</span></span>Because the next digit matter, it is not possible for a 5 digit number to be rounded to 6 digit number.
