Based on the previous works, Durkheim felt that creating a society without crime would be <u>impossible</u>.
<h3>Emile Durkheim</h3>
Emile Durkheim is a famous French sociologist who was generally considered as one of the fathers of modern social science alongside the likes of Karl Max and Max Weber.
In one of his submissions, he concluded that it is <u>impossible</u> to create a society without crime.
According to him, some minor crimes are essential and valuable to society. Otherwise, society could not exist without it.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Impossible</u>."
Learn more about Durkheim here: brainly.com/question/8837353
<span>Diana's behavior is an example of "hoarding disorder".
</span>
Hoarding disorder is a steady trouble disposing of or separating with belonging due to an apparent need to spare them. A man with hoarding disorder encounters trouble at the prospect of disposing of the things. Exorbitant aggregation of things, paying little mind to genuine esteem, happens.
Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
Answer:
the lac operon is a classic example of inductible operon when lactose is present in the cell it is converted to allolactose allolactose acts as an inducer binding to the repressor and preventing the impressor from binding to the operator this allows transcription of the structural genes
