1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
viktelen [127]
3 years ago
13

Last year, 400 signed up to take a virtual kickboxing class. This year, there was a 5% increase in registrations. How many peopl

e will take virtual kickboxing this year
Mathematics
1 answer:
ale4655 [162]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

420 people

Step-by-step explanation:

400*1.05=420

You might be interested in
Write an algebraic equation twice a number increased by 10 is 50
salantis [7]
You need to represent it as   2x + 10 = 50
4 0
3 years ago
What is the equation of the top line graphed below?
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

I think it has to y=mx+b

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Ten friends want to play a game, they must be divided into three teams with three people on each team and one field judge, how m
Nookie1986 [14]
there people in each group then one of them can be the field judge
5 0
3 years ago
In a study of the accuracy of fast food drive-through orders, McDonald’s had 33 orders that were not accurate among 362 orders o
melomori [17]

Answer:

A. We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B. Null hypothesis:p=0.1  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.1  

C. z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558  

D. z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96  z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96

E. Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F. So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=362 represent the random sample taken

X=33 represent the number of orders not accurate

\hat p=\frac{33}{363}=0.0912 estimated proportion of orders not accurate

p_o=0.10 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

A: Write the claim as a mathematical statement involving the population proportion p

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B: State the null (H0) and alternative (H1) hypotheses

Null hypothesis:p=0.1  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.1  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

C: Find the test statistic

Since we have all the info required we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558  

D: Find the critical value(s)

Since is a bilateral test we have two critical values. We need to look on the normal standard distribution a quantile that accumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail. And for this case we have:

z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96  z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96

P value

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.05. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(z  

E: Would you Reject or Fail to Reject the null (H0) hypothesis.

Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F: Write the conclusion of the test.

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.  

6 0
3 years ago
30 PTS. + BRAINLIEST PLS HELP AZAP!!!
Papessa [141]

Answer:

C and E would be your Answer!

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which polynomial identity will prove that 49-4=45
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these ordered pairs could you remove to make this relation a function? {(-2,1), (-1, -5), (-1,5), (0, -7), (2, 1)}
    15·1 answer
  • Match the vocabulary to the correct operation practice writing algebratic expressions
    5·1 answer
  • How do you find the hypotenuse of a triangle?
    15·2 answers
  • Which fractions are equivalent? Explain how you know.
    8·1 answer
  • What is true about Marcus's work? Check all that
    11·2 answers
  • Please Help! If (5x-2)^2=ax^2-bx+c, what is the value of a+c^2?
    6·1 answer
  • Listed below are the amounts​ (dollars) it costs for marriage proposal packages at different baseball stadiums. Find the​ range,
    8·1 answer
  • How do I find the perimeter of these regular polygons when only given the area. PS only allowed to use a=1/2bh formula, no other
    6·1 answer
  • There were 50,000 bacteria in a petri dish yesterday at noon, and 40,000 bacteria at noon today. if the trend continues, on what
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!