Group of answer choices.
a. Warning by the human resources department.
b. No consequences.
c. Loss of administrative credential.
d. An angry parent.
Answer:
a. Warning by the human resources department.
Explanation:
Human resources (HR) can be defined as an art of managing, controlling and improving the number of people (employees or workers), functions, activities which are being used effectively and efficiently by an organization.
Hence, human resources managers are saddled with the responsibility of managing and improving the welfare and working conditions of the employees working in an organization.
A possible consequence for failing to investigate a report of unprofessional conduct by a school employee would be to receive a warning by the human resources department.
If an employee working in an organization such as a school is found to act in an unprofessional manner towards a colleague, pupil or a parent, it is expected that the human resources department calls such a person to order through a query, warning in order to serve as a deterrent to others and to avoid a repeat of such behavior in the future.
Answer:
What might be unfair is if the person is trying to say there side but the cop is not listening to the persons reason for why they did it
Explanation:
for my explanation is to just worry about you and if the cops try to say any smart comment don't say anything because all ur gonna do is put yourself in a big hole of trouble
Answer:
The exact definition for chain of command when it comes to evidence is the witnessed and written record of everyone who came in contact with the evidence and had unbroken control of it. Following the chain of command ensures that the evidence collected at the scene is the same evidence that is entered in the courtroom.
Does this help?
Answer:
Fisher sued the University and argued that the use of race as a consideration in the admissions process violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court held that the University's admissions process was constitutional, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed.
