Answer:
the answer for this is yes I will try to follow you
Acute, isosceles (answer)
2. 64 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 2 |64
√64 = √2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 2 |32
√64 = 2 × 2 × 2 2 |16
√64 = 2³ 2 |8
√64 = 8 2 |4
2 |2
3. No positive square root exists for -85 as it is a negative integer. The squares of a number is always positive.
4. 114 is not a perfect square. √114 = 10.677078252
5. √16 = 4
6. √105 = 10 (nearest)
7. √81 = 9
8. √14 = 4 (nearest)
9. √8 = 3 (nearest)
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
The velocity of a moving body is given by the equation:

Is the velocity is <em>positive </em>(v>0), then our object will be moving <em>forwards</em>.
And if the velocity is negative (v<0), then our object will be moving <em>backwards</em>.
We want to find between which interval(s) is the object moving backwards. Hence, the second condition. Therefore:

By substitution:

Solve. To do so, we can first solve for <em>t</em> and then test values. By factoring:

Zero Product Property:

Now, by testing values for t<1, 1<t<4, and t>4, we see that:

So, the (only) interval for which <em>v</em> is <0 is the second interval: 1<t<4.
Hence, our answer is A.
Its 2 and 1/3
as a decimal its 2.3333
there is no possible way it can be written as a whole number