Answer:
- 8pq-3pq= 5pq
- 2m-3m+4 =4-m
Step-by-step explanation:
- The first equation shows two terms can be combine as follow: 8pq-3pq= (8-3)pq by applying common factoring. Then, because 8-3=5, it can be expressed as 5pq.
- In the second equation, we have only two terms that can be factored by combining the terms that share the same factor (which is m). Then, 2m-3m+4 can be expressed like m(2-3)+4. Because (2-3)=-1 and because the order of the sum does not affect the result, the result is 4-m.
Answer:
Its a
Step-by-step explanation:
A integer is like a whole number by it self
Answer:
A) Sometimes
A ) Sometimes is the correct answer because b) always and c) never is not possible
it cannot be always measured 90 degrees
Answer: Option #4: the 0.2 could be changed to 2.
Explanation:
The table is designed to make the concept of percentages more understandable. The table first allocates the total amount of 70 in terms of its "fifths," or 20% parts. Then it expresses these parts in the last row of the table, showing that 20% of 70 is 14 and all the five parts sum up to 70 again.
Now, Mikel is supposed to express 40% of the amount. So she writes (incorrectly): 0.2 * 14. This statement needs to be changed to 2 * 14 (two times 14 = 28), to correspond to 2 times 20%, or 40% of 70.
This is reflected in the last (fourth) option "The 0.2 in the expression could be changed to 2."
Option #3 is incorrect because changing 14 to 70, will result in an incorrect number (2.8).
Options 1 and 2 are similarly incorrect (as can be easily verified)
Answer:
Wala akong pake kasi ndi naman ako marunong sa math
