1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elenna [48]
2 years ago
15

A naked, male corpse was found at 8AM on Tuesday, July 9.The air temperature wasalready 26.7˚C (81˚F). The body exhibited some s

tiffness in the face and eyelids and had a body temperature of 34.4˚C (93.9˚F). Livor mortis was not evident. Approximately how long ago did the man die? Justify your answer. Would clothing on the body have made a difference in determining the actual time of death in this case? Why or why not?
Physics
1 answer:
Slav-nsk [51]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

x = 9.87 hours ago.

Further explanation is present below.

Explanation:

Data given:

Air Temperature = 26.7°C (81°F)

Body temperature = 34.4°C (93.9°F)

We are given that, Livor mortis was absent. Secondly, The body exhibited some stiffness in the face and eyelids.

So, it can be concluded that, body must have died recently, as Livor mortis was absent plus the presence of stiffness in the face and eyelids. Furthermore,

The normal body temperature = 37°C

Body temperature in our case = 34.4° C

Difference = 37 -34.4 = 2.6°C

And Air temperature = 26.7°C

Which is a very low difference, in addition, it has not acquired the air temperature so, all this evidence certifies that body died recently.

Now, we have to calculate, how recently it died.

Formula:

0.78 . x = difference of body temperature and air temperature

Where, x = number of hours = time required,

0.78 . x = (34.4 - 26.7)

0.78 . x = 7.7

x = 7.7/0.78

x = 9.87 hours ago.

It means that, naked male corpse was died 9.87 hours ago.

Now, we are asked to find out clothing on the body had made a difference or not.

So, Yes it would definitely make a difference. As body would have more warmer than being naked. and it would result in a calculation of a different time of death. (body temperature would have > 34.4°C)

You might be interested in
Engineers and science fiction writers have proposed designing space stations in the shape of a rotating wheel or ring, which wou
Gennadij [26K]

Answer:

a. The station is rotating at 1.496 \frac{rev}{min}

b. the rotation needed is 2.8502 \frac{rev}{min}

Explanation:

We know that the centripetal acceleration is

a_{c}= \omega ^2 r

where \omega is the rotational speed and r is the radius. As the centripetal acceleration is feel like an centrifugal acceleration in the rotating frame of reference (be careful, as the rotating frame of reference is <u>NOT INERTIAL,</u> the centrifugal force is a fictitious force, the real force is the centripetal).

<h3>a. </h3>

The rotational speed  is :

2.7 \frac{m}{s^2} = \omega ^2 * 110  \ m

\omega ^2 = \frac{2.7 \frac{m}{s^2}} {110 \ m}

\omega  = \sqrt{ 0.02454 \frac{rad^2}{s^2} }

\omega  = 0.1567 \frac{rad}{s}

Knowing that there are 2\pi \ rad in a revolution and 60 seconds in a minute.

\omega  = 0.1567 \frac{rad}{s}  \frac{1 \ rev}{2\pi \ rad} \frac{60 \ s}{1 \ min}

\omega  = 1.496 \frac{rev}{min}

<h3>b. </h3>

The rotational speed needed is :

9.8 \frac{m}{s^2} = \omega ^2 * 110  \ m

\omega ^2 = \frac{9.8 \frac{m}{s^2}} {110 \ m}

\omega  = \sqrt{ 0.08909 \frac{rad^2}{s^2} }

\omega  = 0.2985 \frac{rad}{s}

Knowing that there are 2\pi \ rad in a revolution and 60 seconds in a minute.

\omega  = 0.2985 \frac{rev}{min}  \frac{1 \ rev}{2\pi \ rad} \frac{60 \ s}{1 \ min}

\omega  = 2.8502 \frac{rev}{min}

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A 75-kg refrigerator is located on the 70th floor of a skyscraper (300meters a over the ground) What is the potential energy of
Nata [24]
Formula for potential energy is V=mgh, where m is mass in KG, g is earth acceleration (10 m/s^2), and h its height in meters. We know mass, acceleration is constant and also known, we know height also. Lets substitute
V=75*10*300=225000[J]=225[kJ] - its the answer
7 0
3 years ago
A heavy boy and a lightweight girl are balanced on a mass-less seesaw. If they both move forward so that they are one-half their
Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

b) Nothing will happen,  the sea saw will still be balanced.

Explanation:

b) Nothing will happen,  the sea saw will still be balanced.

Reason:-

When two kids are balanced, the sum of torques on the seesaw will be zero.

if each kid, reduces their distances by half, then the torque of each kid will be half and the sum of torque of each on the seesaw will be zero.

Therefore the seesaw is balanced

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why are nuclear power plants controversial
Sliva [168]
Because a nuclear meltdown can be caused if systems fail. 
6 0
3 years ago
How do I do this question?
Mkey [24]

a. 27

after that all you need to do is use the work formula as you will be able to acheive results

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone help me plz<br>it's a glass bell jar and to vacuum pump
    13·1 answer
  • The law of repulsion by Coulomb agrees with:
    7·2 answers
  • The classical pathway for complement activation is initiated by
    5·1 answer
  • In a natural gas power plant, natural gas is burned to heat steam, which turns a turbine. What energy conversion is happening in
    5·2 answers
  • An AC voltage of the form Δv = 95 sin 275t where Δv is in volts and t is in seconds, is applied to a series RLC circuit. If R =
    5·1 answer
  • Which would show an example of how physical changes are reversible?
    15·2 answers
  • 125 cm of gas are collected at 15 °C and
    9·1 answer
  • Why do planets revolve around the sun?​
    8·1 answer
  • 3. Two people push on a car with a force of 5150 N, and the car moves a distance of 8.0m. What is the
    8·2 answers
  • How many sub levels does the third energy level have?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!