Using the confidence interval, it is found that the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
<h3>When does a confidence interval for the difference of proportions gives convincing evidence that there is a difference?</h3>
It gives convincing evidence when 0 is not part of the confidence interval.
In this problem, the interval is (0.02, 0.38), which does not contain 0, hence the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
More can be learned about confidence intervals at brainly.com/question/25890103
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
This means that 4/5 repeats itself 3 times.
So,
![\sf = \frac{4}{5} * \frac{4}{5} * \frac{4}{5} \\\\= \frac{64}{125} \\\\\rule[225]{225}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csf%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B5%7D%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B5%7D%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B5%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B64%7D%7B125%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Crule%5B225%5D%7B225%7D%7B2%7D)
Hope this helped!
<h3>~AH1807</h3>
y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)
y - (-1) = 4[x - (-3)]
y + 1 = 4(x + 3)
y + 1 = 4(x) + 4(3)
y + 1 = 4x + 12
- 1 - 1
y = 4x + 11
The answer is B.
It is the middle because the top and bottom don’t add up or make sense
Answer:
p and n
Step-by-step explanation:
The solution to a system of equations given graphically is at the point of intersection of the 2 lines.
The lines p and n intersect at (3, 6)
Thus (3, 6) is the solution to the system of equations represented by p and n
