1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ehidna [41]
3 years ago
13

Characterize EACH of the three given statements as being TRUE or FALSE and then indicate the collective true-false status of the

statements using the choices. (1) Electron loss is always associated with an increase in oxidation number. (2) An exothermic reaction occurs when the energy required to break bonds in reactants is less than the energy released by bond formation in the products. (3) The concentrations of pure liquids and pure solids are never included in an equilibrium constant expression because such concentrations never change.
Chemistry
1 answer:
Alinara [238K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Electron loss is always associated with an increase in oxidation number- True

An exothermic reaction occurs when the energy required to break bonds in reactants is less than the energy released by bond formation in the products.  True

The concentrations of pure liquids and pure solids are never included in an equilibrium constant expression because such concentrations never change. True

Explanation:

Oxidation implies loss of electrons. When a specie looses electrons, its oxidation number increases. For instance; Fe(s) -----> Fe^2+(aq) + 2e implies an increase in oxidation number of Fe from 0 to +2.

In an exothermic reaction, the energy required to break the bonds in the reactants is less than the energy released when new bonds form in the products.

We do not include the concentrations of pure liquids and pure solids in the equilibrium constant expression because the concentration of these do not change significantly throughout the reaction.

You might be interested in
Select the correct answer.
GREYUIT [131]

Answer:HNO3 + NaOH → H2O + NaNO3

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
What is an inference?
sp2606 [1]

Answer:

A conclusion derived from evidence and logical reasoning

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Increased use of incineration is sometimes advocated as a safe way to dispose of chemical waste. But opponents of incineration p
pochemuha

Answer:

Option A is correct.

At the two incinerators at which leaks were reported, staff had had only cursory training on the proper procedures for incinerating chemical waste.

Explanation:

The main aim of the argument presented is to talk down the use of burning by incinerators method to dispose chemical waste. The argument presents great points in that there were 40 incidents at two existing commissioned incinerators in the last year where unexpected releases of dangerous chemical agents happened.

So, basically, the argument is all about how the high frequency of the unsuspected release of dangerous chemical agents should discourage this method of chemical waste disposal.

The argument then concluded that if more chemical waste are disposed using the burning by incinerator method, there will be more unsuspected release of dangerous chemicals.

We are then required to find the statement that most weakens the conclusion that there will be more toxic releases if more chemical waste are burned.

Analysing the Statements one by one

Statement A

This statement provides a possible reason for this high frequency of dangerous chemical releases. It states that the staff haven't been properly trained. So, this means that properly training the staff should most likely lead to lesser cases of toxic releases into the environment.

This is the statement that most weakens the conclusion.

Statement B

The conclusion wasn't about the incinerator method being the safest method. It was about whether increased incineration would lead to more toxic relaeses. So, this doesn't affect the conclusion.

Statement C

This statement says that incineration can be increased without building new incinerators by tapping into unused capacity at the old incinerators. Also doesn't affect rhe conclusion whether increased use of incineration will lead to more toxic leaks.

Statement D

This statement strengthens the argument; which is the opposite of what we're aiming to achieve.

Statement E

This statement hints that the toxic leaks do not have that much of a harmful effect because the toxic releases do not go beyond the property of the incinerator. This also doesnt tackle the conclusion about the frequency of leaks, it only addresses how not harmful the toxic leaks can be.

Hope this Helps!!!

5 0
4 years ago
Is lithium a good or bad element? (explain why)
ddd [48]

Answer:

Its good

Explanation:

It has power

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help quickly!
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

Iron II - pale green

Copper II - blue

Iron III - orange /brown

Nickel - green

Iron and Copper

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If there was a high pressure system in your area and a bunch of clouds were blown in from a different direction, how would the p
    14·1 answer
  • Heat energy caused by friction is usually a waste product that results when energy
    14·1 answer
  • What happens when water is added to sodium bicarbonate
    14·1 answer
  • What state of matter having a definite volume but no definite shape
    13·2 answers
  • What kind of small objects composes much of the universe
    9·1 answer
  • For each chemical reaction, fill in the exponents in the formula for Ks
    9·1 answer
  • When a 2.5 mol of sugar (C12H22O11) are added to a certain amount of water the boiling point is raised by 1 Celsius degree. If 2
    7·2 answers
  • about how long does it take for the reaction to reach equilibrium in this concentration versus time graph?
    5·2 answers
  • 1. Working in the laboratory, a student find the density of a piece of pure aluminum to be 2.85
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement is not true about the periodic table?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!