<span> Yes, there is a "relationship" regarding the </span>tangent<span> of the two acute angles (A and B) in a right triangle.</span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a) False. There are three factor pairs for 36:
1×36
2×18
3×12
4×9
6×6
b) True.
18 = 2×3²
Odd divisors of 18: 1, 3, 9
1+3+9 = 13
c) False
100 = 2×5²
25 = 5²
Greatest common divisor = 25
Step-by-step explanation:
Given, 3x−2<2x+1
⇒3x−2x<1+2
⇒x<3orx∈(−∞,3)
The lines y=3x−2 and y=2x+1 both will intersect at x=3
Clearly, the dark line shows the solution of 3x−2<2x+1.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
With regards to the factor 'walking device used', the ANOVA conducted on the cadence data revealed a main effect of walking device, and also with the results of the experiment giving rise to a p - value less than 0.05, we can reject the null hypothesis which says, there is no effect of the walking device factor.
We can thus conclude that there is not enough statistics evidence to prove that there is no interaction between the two factors or that there is no effect of the walking device given the cadence data.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We can use algebra to write the decimal in p/q form.
It is now in p/q form.
