The answer to the question is A
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the rules of exponents
× 
= 
, 
= 
, 
= 
Simplifying the product of the first 2 terms
× 
= 
× 
= 
Simplifying the third term
5(
= 5
= 5
Performing the division, that is
← cancel on numerator/ denominator leaves
=
Answer:
1) B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s.
2) A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution table is shown below:
Last Digit Frequency
0 9
1 1
2 1
3 3
4 1
5 11
6 1
7 0
8 3
9 1
1. Based on the distribution table, we see a very disproportionate distribution. There is a high frequency of 0's and 5's. This lays credence to the heights being reported rather than measured. As such, option B is the correct answer
<u>B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s</u>.
2. Since the heights were reported and not measured, they are most certainly not accurate. The conclusion is that the result is not accurate. As such, option A is the correct answer
<u>A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported</u>.
1-2. The best estimate for the population mean would be sample mean of 60 gallons. Since we know that the sample mean is the best point of estimate. Since sample size n=16 is less than 25, we use the t distribution. Assume population from normal distribution.
3. Given a=0.1, the t (0.05, df = n – 1 = 15)=1.75
4. xbar ± t*s/vn = 60 ± 1.75*20/4 = ( 51.25, 68.75)
5. Since the interval include 63, it is reasonable.
Answer:
The minimum guaranteed mileage is 
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The mean is 
The standard deviation is 
Generally for the probability to be 4% the minimum guaranteed mileage is evaluated as
=> 
=> 
From the z table, the critical value corresponding to 0.96 to the left of the curve is
So
=>
