Answer:
d is the answer youre looking for .5x.5= one fourth
Explanation:
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
The answers are conscientiousness, agreeableness,
neuroticism, openness to experience, and extraversion. Researchers who used the
factor analysis method agreed that the mentioned traits are considered to be
core traits of an individual’s personality. Some of these traits are hard to
practice, which is why an individual must be open to experience different things
in order for them to cope up with his or her environment.
what kind of question is that?
Answer:option D= heteronomous morality.
Explanation:
Kohlberg with full name --Lawrence Kohlberg was a psychologist. Lawrence Kohlberg was born on the 25th day of October, in the year 1927 in New York, United States of America and he died on the 19th day of January, in the year 1987 in Massachusetts, United States of America.
while he was still alive, one of Lawrence Kohlberg achievement was him proposing the Stages of Moral Development. Lawrence Kohlberg continued Piaget's work and according to him, heteronomous morality stage is "moral thinking is tied to punishment".
