I would try accepting the cat slowly just by like talking to her every now and then, or getting a stuffed animal that looks like the bunny to try talking to
Answer:
3 years
Explanation:
The computation of the payback period is shown below:
Payback period = Initial investment ÷ Net cash flow
where,
Initial investment is $15,000
And, the net cash flow would be
= Year 1 + year 2 + year 3 + year 4
= $5,000 + $5,000 + $5,000 + $5,000
= $20,000
As we see that the net cash flow is recovered in three years that means net cash flows and the initial investment are equal
So,
Payback period would be
= $15,000 ÷ $15,000
= 3 years
Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
<span>To properly target potential customers, it is necessary to know not only what the needs are of the people they're advertising, they also need to know how the item will be used. There are multiple reasons that a customer would buy an item or service, so I assume media planners would need to use psychographic classifications to know who their target audience is and what they would like. How heavily planners rely on these classsifications probably effects the response they received from the audience.</span>
