The answer to the statement is yes. It is because laws are important to promote fairness and peace. Laws are established to get things done in order and in different places and environment, there are different laws to be followed in which the statement above is related to it.
Answer:
Article 2 of the UCC code states that in order for goods to be merchantable (or fit for sale) they must:
- should correspond to the contract description, e.g. a cereal box should contain cereal
- must be of fair average quality, e.g. the cereal must be edible and be of a reasonable quality, like have a decent flavor
- must be fit to serve the purpose for which an average consumer might purchase them, e.g. you should be able to eat your cereal at breakfast, and it should not require hours or preparation
- the quality of all the units included in the package must be similar, although slight variations are permitted, e.g. cornflakes should be of similar size and quality
- are properly packaged and labeled, e.g. the package should not be broken and it should include relevant information
- fulfill any promise contained in its package or labels, e.g. if the box says it contains cereal with raisins, it must contain cereal with raisins
There are lots of ways in which an implied warranty of merchantability is breached, e.g. if the cereal is spoiled, the box is broken and the contents are falling, cornflakes are all crushed and lost consistency, etc.
Answer:
Option A; INSTRUMENTALITY.
Explanation:
The expectancy theory explains the processes an individual undergoes to make choices.
INSTRUMENTALITY is the perception of employees as to whether they will actually get what they desire or not.
Lucas's concern is related to instrumentality because he is not sure whether the on-time performance goal will be met or not, even if he puts more effort and performs as expected of him because there are other individual who may cause the desired result not to happen.
Therefore, based on expectancy theory, INSTRUMENTALITY is most closely related to Lucas's concern.
Answer: The answer is given below
Explanation:
It should be noted that the split limits approach is used by several auto insurance policies and this simply combines per person and occurrence approach.
For every accident, three dollars amount are being applied. The first limit is simply a per person limit which is the maximum amount that one injured person will get. The second limit is simply the per occurrence limit which is the maximum amount that all the injured persons will get while the third limit applies during the claim of property damage as it is the maximum amount that will be paid for damages by an insurer to property that results from the accident.
since the split is 50/100/20, it implies that $50,000 medical coverage for every injured person, $100,000 injury coverage for all accident victims and then $20,000 for property damage.
1. Bill's insurance company will pay $20000.
2. Amount Bill will pay:
= $17,603 + $3,136 + $9,659 - $20,000
= $30,398 - $20,000
= $10,398
Hi! I don’t know what any of this means but I hope you have an amazing day and I hope god/allah/etc. blesses you :)
sorry I couldn’t answer
