I think that it would be C<span>. Discussing theories and projecting personal motives and bias. Writing out the manner, method and conclusion of a historians study.
</span>
Hope this helps! Please mark me Brainliest! Thx.
The early modern European period occurred roughly from the 1450's until the 1700's.
Puritanism arose during the late 1500's and appealed to those that wanted to "purify" the English Church and English culture. Puritans lived strictly by the Bible and wanted to do away with the former glitz, glamour, ceremony, rituals, and riches of the Catholic Church. They believed that the combination of church and government, the King was the head of the country's government and church, would lead to tyrannical rule.
Also, Englishmen wanted to be purely "English" with no ties to Spain or its Catholicism. This included religion. The common man often could agree with this anti-Spanish/Catholic and stance wanting to break ties with their Spanish rivals after the defeat of the Spanish Armada by the British Navy.
During the early European/Elizabethan time period Catholics and the Catholic clergy were not to be trusted with priests being executed or tortured and their supporters fined or imprisoned.
Their roads and stable infrastructure were the primary reasons that they were able to control such a large empire
1) McArthurs: If McArthur attacked and finished off NK, sure we might have heightened the Cold War, but the USSR (now russia) wouldn't have attacked us back with nukes. We might have been able to take out communism from the Koreas.
coming back into present day, we wouldn't have a puny country trying to make nuclear missiles to shoot at us and having propaganda about how bad america is. If McArthur had his way, Korea may not be the way it is now
(but then that was how fate wanted it)
hope this helps
