Question

Given the drawing as shown below and that p || a, which of the following cannot be supported by the evidence shown?

Answer 1

Answer:

D. <b ≅ <g

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that lines p and q are parallel to each other, therefore the following can be concluded:

✔️<f ≅ <h, this is because they are both Vertical angles.

✔️<d and <h are supplematry, this is because they are same side consecutive interior angles. Consecutive angles are supplematry.

✔️<a and <b are supplematry, this is because they are linear pair angles.

✔️<b cannot be congruent to <g. They are not corresponding angles, nor are they alternate interior angles.