All categories

3 years ago

Solve: -7(3x - 7) + 21x > 50

Mathematics

1 answer:

Allushta [10]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Use PEMDAS

solve the equations inside the parentheses

3x -7= -4

plug it in

-7(-4x) + 21x ≥ 50

there are no exponts so we multiply

-7 x -4x= 28x

plug it in

28x + 21x ≥ 50

no division so we add

28x + 21x = 49x

plug it in

49x ≥ 50

I think it would be C

because 49 is one less then 50

sorry if I am wrong

mark as brainliest :)

You might be interested in

Please help I need help with this badly asap !

evablogger [386]

Answer:

The third option

Step-by-step explanation:

It perfectly represents -24/3.

7 0

3 years ago

Match each pair of polynomials to their sum.

Alex17521 [72]

Answers:

(12x^2 + 3x + 6) + (-7x^2 – 4x – 2) = 5x^2 - x + 4

(2x2 – x) + (-x – 2x2 – 2) = -2x - 2

(x3 + x2 + 2) + (x2 – 2 – x3) = 2x^2

(x2 + x) + (x2 + 8x – 2) = 2x^2 + 9x - 2

4 0

3 years ago

The area of a face of a cube is 144cm^2 . find its volume

love history [14]

Step-by-step explanation:

1 face area = length x width (aka length x length since cube)

therefore 1 side = ±√144 cm = 12 cm or - 12cm (rej as length > 0cm)

volume = length x width x height = 12 x 12 x 12 = 1728cm^3

Topic: Mensuration

If you would like to venture further into mathematics, you can check out my Instagram page (learntionary) where I post notes and mathematics tips. Thanks!

5 0

3 years ago

A sample of 200 observations from the first population indicated that x1 is 170. A sample of 150 observations from the second po

igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

a) For this case the value of the significanceis $\alpha=0.05$ and $\alpha/2 =0.025$ , we need a value on the normal standard distribution thataccumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail and we got:

$z_{\alpha/2} =1.96$

If the calculated statistic $|z_{calc}| >1.96$ we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance

b) Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{170+110}{200+150}=0.8$

c) $z=\frac{0.85-0.733}{\sqrt{0.8(1-0.8)(\frac{1}{200}+\frac{1}{150})}}=2.708$

d) Since the calculated value satisfy this condition 2.708>1.96 we have enough evidence at 5% of significance that we have a significant difference between the two proportions analyzed.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$X_{1}=170$ represent the number of people with the characteristic 1

$X_{2}=110$ represent the number of people with the characteristic 2

$n_{1}=200$ sample 1 selected

$n_{2}=150$ sample 2 selected

$p_{1}=\frac{170}{200}=0.85$ represent the proportion estimated for the sample 1

$p_{2}=\frac{110}{150}=0.733$ represent the proportion estimated for the sample 2

$\hat p$ represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

$\alpha=0.05$ significance level given

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if is there is a difference between the two proportions, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

a.State the decision rule.

For this case the value of the significanceis $\alpha=0.05$ and $\alpha/2 =0.025$ , we need a value on the normal standard distribution thataccumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail and we got:

$z_{\alpha/2} =1.96$

If the calculated statistic $|z_{calc}| >1.96$ we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance

b. Compute the pooled proportion.

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{170+110}{200+150}=0.8$

c. Compute the value of the test statistic.

z-test: Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other.

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.85-0.733}{\sqrt{0.8(1-0.8)(\frac{1}{200}+\frac{1}{150})}}=2.708$

d. What is your decision regarding the null hypothesis?

Since the calculated value satisfy this condition 2.708>1.96 we have enough evidence at 5% of significance that we have a significant difference between the two proportions analyzed.

5 0

3 years ago

I got 1792 do I have to divide this number by 32?

bulgar [2K]

Yeah, you'd divide 1792 by 32 to get 56.

8 0

3 years ago