In geometry proofs, we commonly use step-by-step logic to figure out the proof. This is commonly used in Computer Science for understanding how computers work, process, and store information(I speak from personal experience). This is also commonly used in Law. You use this in Law as a lawyer to deduce information using step-by-step logical processes and logic, otherwise it's just wishful thinking. So, Law also uses the same reasoning skills used in Geometry proofs.
It seems okay to me (if that what your asking) I don't know this subject very well ut the part your working on " I'm familiar with ?" Don't be surprised if I was wrong buuuuut it does look okay to me "(the answer)".
Answer:
sorry for the late response it's c224
[891/33=27] ratio of the two prism: hencesurface area of smaller prism is[153/27]=5.67cm
Formula: Distance = rate * time
570 = (R+(R-18))*3
570 = (2R - 18)*3
190 = 2R-16
208 = 2R
R = 104
Eastbound Train: 86mph
Westbound Train: 104mph
