The flaw that is shown in the local newspaper article on the herbal supplement has the flaw of B. Correlational data used to suggest causation.
<h3>Why does correlation not equate to causation?</h3>
Correlation is not the same as causation and this means that just because two variables are occurring at the same time does not mean that one variable is causing the other. There could be extenuating circumstances involved.
In this case, there is no evidence that the herbal supplement is the reason why those who take it have less fatigue. There might be other factors such as those people take generally healthy food in general.
Find out more on correlation and causation at brainly.com/question/12479370
#SPJ1
That statement is False.
MAslow hierarchy of needs depict a clear path which indicates that people wouldn't be able to fulfill the needs on higher hierarchy if we haven't fulfill the needs on lower hierarchy.
Here's his hierarchy's arrangement from top to bottom:
- self actualization
- Self-esteem
- Love/belonging
- safety
- Physiological
But often times, we do not follow this hierarchy from bottom to top. (for example, some obsessed individual might want to sacrifice need for love/belonging as long as she could realized her life-long dream i.e: self-actualization)
Foreigners and immigrants.
Answer:
The correct option is: B. People with these disorders exhibit a personality style that differs markedly from the expectations of their culture
Explanation:
Dissociative disorders are defined as the medical condition caused by some form of psychological stress or trauma and are characterized by breakdown or disruption of self awareness, memory, perception or identity of an individual.
Dissociative disorders includes Dissociative identity disorder, Dissociative amnesia, Dissociative fugue, Dissociative seizuresm, Depersonalization disorder.
<u>Therefore, option B. is false of dissociative disorders.</u>
Answer:
The correct answers would be Continuous and Partial.
Explanation:
A trainer wants a pigeon to quickly learn to peck a button to obtain food. She also wants to be sure the behavior is resistant to extinction. So she should use Continuous Reinforcement until the response is mastered followed by Partial Reinforcement.
Continuous reinforcement is the reinforcement of behavior each time it occurs, whereas partial reinforcement is when the behavior is reinforced only some times.
Because the trainer wants to be sure that the behavior is resistant to extinction, so to make it interesting, she should use continuous reinforcement until the pigeon is trained, and then partial reinforcement should be used to keep the interest.
