3(m - n + 2) + 6

The Damon family owns a large grape vineyard in western New York along Lake Erie. The grapevines must be sprayed at the beginnin

solniwko [45]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a test of 2 population proportions. Let 1 and 2 be the subscript for the the vines infested using Pernod 5 and vines infested using Action. The population proportion of the vines infested using Pernod 5 and vines infested using Action would be p1 and p2 respectively.

p1 - p2 = difference in the proportion of the vines infested using Pernod 5 and vines infested using Action.

The null hypothesis is

H0 : p1 = p2

p1 - p2 = 0

The alternative hypothesis is

Ha : p1 ≠ p2

p1 - p2 ≠ 0

it is a two tailed test

Sample proportion = x/n

Where

x represents number of success(number of complaints)

n represents number of samples

For vines infested using Pernod 5,

x1 = 26

n1 = 410

p1 = 26/410 = 0.063

For vines infested using Action,

x2 = 39

n2 = 400

P2 = 39/400 = 0.098

The pooled proportion, pc is

pc = (x1 + x2)/(n1 + n2)

pc = (26 + 39)/(410 + 400) = 0.08

1 - pc = 1 - 0.08 = 0.92

z = (p1 - p2)/√pc(1 - pc)(1/n1 + 1/n2)

z = (0.063 - 0.098)/√(0.08)(0.92)(1/410 + 1/400) = - 0.035/0.019066

z = - 1.84

Since it is a two tailed test, the curve is symmetrical. We will look at the area in both tails. Since it is showing in one tail only, we would double the area

From the normal distribution table, the area below the test z score in the left tail 0.033

We would double this area to include the area in the right tail of z = 1.84 Thus

p = 0.033 × 2 = 0.066

By using the p value,

Since alpha, 0.01 < than the p value, 0.066, then we would fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, At a 1% level of significance, we cannot conclude that there is a difference in the proportion of vines infested using Pernod 5 as opposed to Action

5 0

3 years ago

Can someone help me please

aleksklad [387]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

IS a parallelogram

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope formula for the slope of the line between points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) is ...

m = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1)

The distance formula for the length of that same line is ...

d = √((x2 -x1)^2 +(y2 -y1)^2)

Here, you're asked to use each of these formulas 4 times, once for each side of the quadrilateral. I find it convenient to let a calculator or spreadsheet do the repetitive calculations. The result is attached.

The attachment shows that opposites sides have the same length and slope, so are parallel. The quadrilateral is a parallelogram. (The two points used in each calculation are the ones on the result line and the line immediately below. That is why point B is copied to the end of the list.)

_____

<em>Additional comments</em>

There are much simpler ways to prove the figure is a parallelogram. My favorite is to add the coordinates of the end points of the diagonals:

B +D = (-2+6, -9-3) = (4, -12)

C +E = (0+4, -5-7) = (4, -12)

These values being the same demonstrates the midpoints of the diagonals are coincident. That will only be the case if the quadrilateral is a parallelogram.

__

If you must use slope and distance formulas, showing either pair of opposite sides is parallel and have the same length is sufficient to guarantee that the other two sides are also parallel and have the same length. That is, the calculations required in this problem only need to be applied to one pair of opposite sides. (Using a spreadsheet, it's not a lot of extra work to do the calculations for both pairs of opposite sides.)