1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex_Xolod [135]
3 years ago
10

5) Phillip earns $11.25 per hour. During Week 1, he worked h hours. During Week 2, he worked 8

Mathematics
1 answer:
Naddik [55]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

2,160 Hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok so usual i would split $540 in half so a number multiplied by two would end up as 540, and i got 270. So since each week we know Phillip earned $270 and $11.25 a hour, we can divide 270 by 11.25, which gives us $24, so that means h = 24, but on week 2 it says Phillip worked 8 hours more on week 2, so that gives us a equation of 8 x 11.25, which comes out to 90, so now we can move on to our final equation, 90 x 24, which equals 2160. Im so sorry if this is wrong

You might be interested in
What missing number would complete the factorization k^2 + 5k + 6 = (k + 2) (k + ? )
timurjin [86]
The answer would be 3. 
<span>k^2 + 5k + 6 = (k + 2) (k + 3)

HOPE THIS HELPS! ^_^</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Where did Jordan make her mistake? GIVING BRAINLIEST!
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

Jordan made mistake in his first step while multiplying.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given expression of Jordan's work is

14(8+4x) = 6x-(5-11x)

In the first step, Jordan multiplied the numbers to remove the braces.

He multiplied 14(8+4x) wrong as 14*8 is 112 rather than 126and on the right hand side, he did not change the sign of 11x to positive as two negatives are positive when multiplied.

Hence,

Jordan made mistake in his first step while multiplying.

7 0
3 years ago
How do you solve the compound inequality?
NikAS [45]

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve a compound inequality, first separate it into two inequalities. Determine whether the answer should be a union of sets ("or") or an intersection of sets ("and"). Then, solve both inequalities and graph.

Hopes this helps.

6 0
3 years ago
Please help me!!!!!!
kvasek [131]

2 would be the correct answer ;-)))) (1 on top?)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A student at a four-year college claims that mean enrollment at four-year colleges is higher than at two-year colleges in the Un
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

Part 1: The statistic

t=\frac{(\bar X_{1}-\bar X_{2})-\Delta}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}} (1)  

And the degrees of freedom are given by df=n_1 +n_2 -2=35+35-2=68  

Replacing we got

t=\frac{(5135-4436)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{783^2}{35}+\frac{553^2}{35}}}}=4.31  

Part 2: P value  

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(t_{68}>4.31)=0.000022 \approx 0.00002  

Comparing the p value we see that is lower compared to the significance level of 0.01 so then we can reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the mean for the four year college is significantly higher than the mean for the two year college and then the claim makes sense

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given

\bar X_{1}=5135 represent the mean for four year college

\bar X_{2}=4436 represent the mean for two year college

s_{1}=783 represent the sample standard deviation for four year college

s_{2}=553 represent the sample standard deviation two year college

n_{1}=35 sample size for the group four year college

n_{2}=35 sample size for the group two year college

\alpha=0.01 Significance level provided

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

System of hypothesis

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the mean enrollment at four-year colleges is higher than at two-year colleges in the United States , the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\leq 0  

Alternative hypothesis:\mu_{1} - \mu_{2}> 0  

We can assume that the normal distribution is assumed since we have a large sample size for each case n>30. So then the sample mean can be assumed as normally distributed.

Part 1: The statistic

t=\frac{(\bar X_{1}-\bar X_{2})-\Delta}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}} (1)  

And the degrees of freedom are given by df=n_1 +n_2 -2=35+35-2=68  

Replacing we got

t=\frac{(5135-4436)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{783^2}{35}+\frac{553^2}{35}}}}=4.31  

Part 2: P value  

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(t_{68}>4.31)=0.000022  

Comparing the p value we see that is lower compared to the significance level of 0.01 so then we can reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the mean for the four year college is significantly higher than the mean for the two year college and then the claim makes sense

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You have linear functions p(x) and q(x). You know p(2)=3, and p(q(x))=4x+7 for all x. Find q(-1).
    7·1 answer
  • Find the sum of the whole numbers from 1 to 960
    8·1 answer
  • Instruction
    5·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE ASAP???!!!!!! !!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Georgia’s gross pay was $35,600 this year. She is to pay a federal income tax of 16%. How much should Georgia pay in federal inc
    14·2 answers
  • A garden is designed in the shape of a rhombus formed
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE DONT AWNSER ANYTHING RANDOM I REALLY NEED THIS AND DO YOUR OWN AWNSER
    13·1 answer
  • A school survey found that 24 out of 30 students prefer chocolate milk to white milk. If the school has 500 students, which is t
    7·1 answer
  • What is f(5) for the function below?<br> f (x) = 6x – 10
    15·1 answer
  • What's bigger? (6×5)⁷÷(-3)⁷ or (6×5)⁴÷(-3)⁴​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!