Answer:
Rectangle.
Step-by-step explanation:
The 2 dimensional section would be a rectangle.
4.

5.

doesn't belong with the other three because it is irrational number
The other three can be expressed as a ratio between two <span>integers.

</span>
Answer:
110 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
The length of fencing is four times the perimeter of one garden.
The formula for the perimeter of a rectangle is
P = 2l + 2w
The total perimeter for all four rectangles is
P = 4× (2l + 2w) = 8l + 8w
Data:
l = 9¼ ft
w = 4½ ft
Calculation:
P = 8l + 8w = 8×9¼ + 8×4½ = 72⁸/₄ + 32⁸/₂ =(72 + 2) + (32 + 4) = 74 + 36 = 110 ft
The total length of fencing is 110 ft.
Answer:
- 6.04 km (per angle marks)
- 5.36 km (per side hash marks)
Step-by-step explanation:
Going by the angle indicators, the ratios of corresponding sides of the similar triangles are ...
x/2000 = 4200/3500
x = 2000·6/5 = 2400 . . . . yards
Then the distance of interest is ...
(2400 yd + 4200 yd)×(0.0009144 km/yd) = 6.6×.9144 km
= 6.03504 km ≈ 6.04 km
_____
Going by the red hash marks, the ratios of corresponding sides of the similar triangles are ...
x/2000 = 3500/4200
x = 2000·(5/6) = 5000/3 . . . . yards
Then the distance of interest is ...
(5000/3 + 4200) yd × 0.0009144 km/yd ≈ 5.36 km
_____
<em>Comment on the figure</em>
The usual geometry here is that the outside legs (opposite the vertical angles) are parallel, meaning that the angle indicators are the correct marks. It is possible, but unusual, for the red hash marks to be correct and the angle indicators to be mismarked. The red hash marks seem tentatively drawn, so seem like they're more likely to be the incorrect marks.
ANSWER:
104
STEP-BY-STEP EXPLANATION:
Given:
Standard deviation (σ) = 700
Confidence level = 95%
Mean error (Eμ) = 135
We have for a confidence level of 95%:

Now, we calculate the minimum value of the sample size as follows:

The minimum sample size needed is 104