All categories

2 years ago

The image above shows a ______ wave.

Chemistry

1 answer:

Soloha48 [4]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

longitudinal

Explanation:

the wave travels in the same direction as the movement from the person

You might be interested in

A mixture of0.161 moles of C is reacted with 0.117 moles of O2 in a sealed, 10.0 L-vessel at 500.0 K, producing a mixture of CO

labwork [276]

Answer:

number of moles of CO2 is 0.054

number of moles of CO is 0.107

number of moles of O2 remaining is 0.01 mole

mole fraction of CO is 0.63

Explanation:

Firstly, we write the equation of reaction;

3C(s) +2O2(g) → CO2(g) +2CO(g)

Now, we proceed.

From the written equation, we can deduce that

3 mol C = 2 mol O2 = 1 mol CO2 = 2 mol CO

No of mol of C reacted = 0.161 mol

limiting reactant according to the question is Carbon

a. no of mol of CO2 formed = 0.161*1/3 = 0.054 moles ( no of moles of CO2 formed is one-third of no of moles of carbon reacted. This is obtainable from their mole ratio 1:3)

b. no of mol of CO formed = 0.161*2/3 = 0.107 mol

c. no of mol of O2 remaining = 0.117 - (0.151*2/3) = 0.117-0.107 = 0.01 mole

d. mole fraction of CO = no of mol of CO/Total number of moles

= 0.107/(0.107+0.054+0.01)

= 0.625730994152 which is approximately 0.63

5 0

2 years ago

Some SbCl5 is allowed to dissociate into SbCl3 and Cl2 at 521 K. At equilibrium, [SbCl5] = 0.195 M, and [SbCl3] = [Cl2] = 6.98×1

Brilliant_brown [7]

Answer:

a) The equilibrium will shift in the right direction.

b) The new equilibrium concentrations after reestablishment of the equilibrium :

$[SbCl_5]=(0.370-x) M=(0.370-0.0233) M=0.3467 M$

$[SbCl_3]=(6.98\times 10^{-2}+x) M=(6.98\times 10^{-2}+0.0233) M=0.0931 M$

$[Cl_2]=(6.98\times 10^{-2}+x) M=(6.98\times 10^{-2}+0.0233) M=0.0931 M$

Explanation:

$SbCl_5(g)\rightleftharpoons SbCl_3(g) + Cl_2(g)$

a) Any change in the equilibrium is studied on the basis of Le-Chatelier's principle.

This principle states that if there is any change in the variables of the reaction, the equilibrium will shift in the direction to minimize the effect.

On increase in amount of reactant

$SbCl_5(g)\rightleftharpoons SbCl_3(g) + Cl_2(g)$

If the reactant is increased, according to the Le-Chatlier's principle, the equilibrium will shift in the direction where more product formation is taking place. As the number of moles of $SbCl_5$ is increasing .So, the equilibrium will shift in the right direction.

$SbCl_5(g)\rightleftharpoons SbCl_3(g) + Cl_2(g)$

Concentration of $SbCl_5$ = 0.195 M

Concentration of $SbCl_3$ = $6.98\times 10^{-2} M$

Concentration of $Cl_2$ = $6.98\times 10^{-2} M$

On adding more $[SbCl_5$ to 0.370 M at equilibrium :

$SbCl_5(g)\rightleftharpoons SbCl_3(g) + Cl_2(g)$

Initially

0.370 M $6.98\times 10^{-2}M$

At equilibrium:

(0.370-x)M $(6.98\times 10^{-2}+x)M$

The equilibrium constant of the reaction = $K_c$

$K_c=2.50\times 10^{-2}$

The equilibrium expression is given as:

$K_c=\frac{[SbCl_3][Cl_2]}{[SbCl_5]}$

$2.50\times 10^{-2}=\frac{(6.98\times 10^{-2}+x)M\times (6.98\times 10^{-2}+x)M}{(0.370-x) M}$

On solving for x:

x = 0.0233 M

The new equilibrium concentrations after reestablishment of the equilibrium :

$[SbCl_5]=(0.370-x) M=(0.370-0.0233) M=0.3467 M$

$[SbCl_3]=(6.98\times 10^{-2}+x) M=(6.98\times 10^{-2}+0.0233) M=0.0931 M$

$[Cl_2]=(6.98\times 10^{-2}+x) M=(6.98\times 10^{-2}+0.0233) M=0.0931 M$

3 0

3 years ago

What is the origin of fahrenheit and centigrade temperature scales?.

padilas [110]

Answer:

The 18th-century German physicist Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit originally took as the zero of his scale the temperature of an equal ice-salt mixture

Explanation:

8 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Why the core is metallic and the lower mantle is not.

Ugo [173]

Answer:

due to the overlaying layers of strata (layers of earth) an high pressure is created at the core. due to this it behaves like an solid rether than being a liquid... the lower mantle is not solid because in this case the overlaying strata doesn't produce that much pressure on it..

Explanation:

brainliest plz

6 0

2 years ago

What effect does observing a substance's physical properties have on the substance?

dybincka [34]

Depending on the testing process being used, it may affect the object by making it shape differently, scratch, it or sometimes do absolutely nothing. hope this helps:)

5 0

3 years ago