1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jet001 [13]
3 years ago
7

What is the missing reason in the proof ?

Mathematics
1 answer:
ValentinkaMS [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

The reflexive property of congruence basically says that a segment is congruent with itself. B and C are related to angles so do not apply here.

You might be interested in
Write the prime factorization of 3.
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

there is none prime factorization of 3. Since it cant be multiplied by anything to get 3 like 2 and 5 and 7

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Solve 2/3 - 6y = - 1 5/6
alukav5142 [94]

Answer:

<u> y = 19/36</u>

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming that what you want is the value of y, you can pass all the right side stuff to the left, and the y to the right:

2/3 + 15/6 = 6y

Then you can sum the fractions on the left by using the same denominators:

4/6 + 15/6 = 6y       ==>      19/6 = 6 * y

then  you can pass the 6 that is multiplying on the right to the left - now dividing:

<u> y = 19/36</u>

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use lagrange multiplier techniques to find the local extreme values of f(x, y) = x2 − y2 − 2 subject to the constraint x2 + y2 =
dexar [7]
Given f(x,\ y)=x^2-y^2-2 subject to the constraint x^2+y^2=16

Let g(x,\ y)=x^2+y^2.

The gradient vectors of f and g are:

\nabla f(x,\ y)=\langle2x,-2y\rangle and \nabla g(x,\ y)=\langle2x,2y\rangle

By Lagrange's theorem, there is a number \lambda, such that

\langle2x,-2y\rangle=\lambda\langle2x,2y\rangle=\langle2\lambda x,2\lambda y\rangle

\lambda=\pm1

It can be seen that f(x,\ y)=x^2-y^2-2 has local extreme values at the given region.
6 0
3 years ago
2/3 + 1/2 in simple form fractions
nata0808 [166]
Try and find the common denominator which is 6 since 2×3 is 6 then once u get ur denominator u have to find the numerator which would be 4/6+3/6 And that would equal 7/6 and if you would u would keep it like that but if u would have to change it into a mixed fraction it would be 1 and 1/6

Hoped this helped
3 0
3 years ago
Which estimate is closest to the answer of this number sentence?
spayn [35]
The answer is 11 :)))))
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A grocery store’s receipts show that Sunday customer purchases have a skewed distribution with a mean of $32 and a standard devi
    15·1 answer
  • Solve for a.<br><br> 5a - 2 = 23<br> a = ?
    12·2 answers
  • How many times can 95 go into 96
    12·1 answer
  • What is the GCF of 84 and 56
    9·2 answers
  • Find the volume and round to the nearest hundredths place when necessary.
    10·1 answer
  • X = 1/4 y = 2/3 z = 4 1/5
    10·1 answer
  • What is the radius of the circle?
    7·1 answer
  • The functions g and h are given by g(x) = x + 1 and h(x) = x²
    12·1 answer
  • What is the equivalent expression for 4(w-5)?
    15·1 answer
  • The vertices of triangle JKL are J(–2, 3), K(1, 6), and L(3, –2). Which type of triangle best describes triangle JKL
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!