Answer: I will vote in favor of the bill.
Explanation:
Based on the above scenario, I would vote in favor of the bill. The argument here is in the case of bankruptcy, if an individual is willing to pay their dues but because of unavoidable financial circumstances, the individual seeks more time or other assistance which can help so that the person will later pay. I believe it's a good idea which should be supported by the law.
The court should have the right to decide terms of mortgages to help debtors in order for them to pay their debts in future rather than forcing them to leave the house. It will also help the country deal with issue of facilitating housing to maximum number of individuals.
In my opinion, the judge's decision should be given prime importance as the judge must evaluate the intention of the debtor and the capability of the debtor to pay the debts
Answer:
70.83%
Explanation:
Given that,
Company's assets = $1,200
Equity = $350
Dept = Reported assets - Company's equity
= $1,200 - $350
= $850
Dept ratio = (Debt ÷ Total assets) × 100
= ($850 ÷ $1,200) × 100
= 0.7083 × 100
= 70.83%
Therefore, the Dept ratio of Converse Florists & Co. is 70.83%.
Answer:
It would be C. If this question has more than one answer, then it would be C & E
Explanation:
Answer: $471,324.61
Explanation:
Price of a bond = Present value of coupon payments + Present value of face value at maturity
Coupon payments = 500,000 * 11% * 1/2 years = $27,500
Periodic yield = 12%/ 2 = 6% per semi annual period
Periods = 10 * 2 = 20 semi annual periods
Coupon payment is constant so it is an annuity.
Price of bond = Present value of annuity + Present value of face value at maturity
= (Annuity * Present value interest factor of Annuity, 6%, 20 years) + Face value / (1 + rate) ^ number of periods
= (27,500 * 11.4699) + 500,000 / (1 + 6%)²⁰
= $471,324.61
Claims that drop-out rate has increased because more women have taken jobs in the workplace is an example of false cause fallacy.
A false cause fallacy is said to occur in a statement because the link between the premises and conclusion does not even exist.
Here, phrase one is "high school drop-out rate has increased" and phrase two is <em>"because </em><em>more women </em><em>have </em><em>taken jobs </em><em>in the workplace"</em>
<em />
If we assess the two phrase, we will observe that their is no link between the statement to facilitate a valid conclusion because when woman taking jobs in workplaces can not result to increase in drop rate in high school.
Therefore, it is an example of false cause fallacy.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/6987057</em>
