Answer:
C. Practicing effective corporate governance
Explanation:
Accounting scandals refer to the scandals of the business that occurs from the change in the financial statements that to be done in a deliberate manner also the disclosing information is misled. It involves an organization as a whole.
In order to prevent the accounting scandals and the global financial crisis it could practicing corporate governance in an effective manner
Hence, the correct option is C.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The benefits of bank reconciliation is to detect errors such as double payments, missed payments, calculation errors etc.
Therefore they will be no need for adjustment to be recorded for bank errors, outstanding checks, and deposits in transit.
Organization Expenses Dr 7,500
Cash 7,500
June 14 Cash Dr 120,000
Common Stock 110,000
Paid-In Capital in Excess of par value—Common 10,000
June 22 Cash Dr 120,000
Preferred Stock 90,000
Paid-In Capital in Excess of par value—Preferred 30,000
Answer:
b.the statement is invalid because the nominal
Explanation:
pa brainliest po
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
