Answer:
The correct approach is Option B (Peer Review).
Explanation:
- Rather made reference to someone as a scientific peer-review, it encourages the specialist who has not been essential to the study team to analyze the study objectively and pointed out everyone's mistakes. It serves as major self-regulation for scholars and aims to make the publishing process somewhat credible. Hence, the solution to this issue is Peer Examination.
- Funding organizations rarely have the capabilities to recognize out mistakes, whereas definitive analysis is a method of study that helps to make a definitive statement. The gathering of data is simply a process of scientific study.
Other approaches do not apply to the example mentioned. Although the one mentioned is right.
Mole=number of molecules/6.02x10²³
mole=2
number of molecules= 2x6.02x10²³
number of molecules=12.04x10²³
The correct Answer for this question is D
Answer:
[H₂] = 1.61x10⁻³ M
Explanation:
2H₂S(g) ⇋ 2H₂(g) + S₂(g)
Kc = 9.30x10⁻⁸ = ![\frac{[H_{2}]^2[S_{2}]}{[H_{2}S]^2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5BH_%7B2%7D%5D%5E2%5BS_%7B2%7D%5D%7D%7B%5BH_%7B2%7DS%5D%5E2%7D)
First we <u>calculate the initial concentration</u>:
0.45 molH₂S / 3.0L = 0.15 M
The concentrations at equilibrium would be:
[H₂S] = 0.15 - 2x
[H₂] = 2x
[S₂] = x
We <u>put the data in the Kc expression and solve for x</u>:


We make a simplification because x<<< 0.0225:

x = 8.058x10⁻⁴
[H₂] = 2*x = 1.61x10⁻³ M
C. HNO₃(aq) + KOH(aq) → KNO₃(aq) + H₂O