Answer:
If the force remains the same, the acceleration would decrease
Explanation:
According to Newton's second law, the acceleration of an object is given by

where
F is the force applied to the object
m is the mass of the object
As we see from the formula, the acceleration a is inversely proportional to the mass, m. Therefore, if the force F remains constant, this means that if the mass of the skateboarder increases, then the acceleration will decrease.
Answer:

Explanation:
The work (W) done by the gas can be calculated using the following equation:

<u>Where:</u>
p: is the pressure
[tex}V_{f}[/tex]: is the final volume
[tex}V_{i}[/tex]: is the initial volume
In the first process, the work done by the gas is:

Since the volume remains constant, the total work done by the gas is equal to zero.
In the second process, the work done by the gas is:
Now, the total work done by the gas during both processes is:

Therefore, the total work done by the gas during both processes is - 24 kJ.
I hope it helps you!
Explanation:
Given,
- m = 100 kg
- g = 10 N/kg¹
- h = 60 m
- t = 20 s
To Find:
a) Work done by the pump
b) Potential energy stored in the water
c)Power spent by the pump
d)Power rating of the pump.
Solution:
We know that,

- f = 100 kg * 10N/kg
- d = 60 m



[The unit'll be joule since N×M = J]
- b) Potential energy stored in the water

- m = 100 kg
- g = 10N/kg
- h = 60


- same condition here as well, N×M = J
- c) Power of the Pump

- where P = Power; W = Work done & T = Time taken
- As we got the value of work done on question (a),& ATQ time taken is 20 S.

- d) Power rating of the pump = 3 kW
Assumption: The pump is 100% efficient & works well.
Answer:
Initial angular position of the disc is 3 radian
Explanation:
As we know that the angular acceleration of the disc is given as

initial angular speed is given as

now we know that angular displacement of the disc is given as



now we have



Answer:
It would be (a)
Explanation:
A theory is something that can be proved through rigorous and repeated experimentation, while choice (b) sounds tempting i believe it fails at the fact that it says that a theory is an "agreement", sure an agreement could be reached by while trained scientists but that does not necessarily mean that what the scientists agree upon is rigorously tested and repeatable, and so therefore cannot be assumed
That is what I think
Hope this helps :)