Answer:
business meeting structure
Explanation:
For example, during a meeting with managers, technicians and financial director and sales director, the communication should flow from one another naturally despite of the hierarchy, since all participants have respect and politeness.
Answer:
a.No contract was formed because the offer was not communicated to the offeree by the means chosen by the offeror.
Explanation:
Hello! It was an oversight on the part of the secretary to comment on the proposal informally, as it ended up contaminating the entire plan that the boss had in her new offer for Deanna, causing discontent because the contract was serious and it's converted in an unprofessional situation.
Thanks for your question!
The direct democracy or pure democracy it´s a form of democracy in which the people directly decides on policy initiatives, it differs from the representative democracy; the one that it´s currently established in the majority of the countries; because in that the people choose the representantives and they are those who decide the policies to carry on. In the representative democracy the people do not govern, it´s a common mistake to mix both concepts.
Two different forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. The deliberative democracy is a form in which the deliberation it´s a central matter to the decisions and it is seen as an amalgalm of the direct and the representative democracies. It holds that for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by an authentic deliberation not a mere voting.
The participatory democracy is one that emphasizes the broad participation of everybody but it demands to the citizens to be more involved in the political participation.
I think that a group taking a vote on something is an example of a participatory democracy because everyone have the same power to create consensus and, at last it would win the iniciative that obtain more votes. If the example was a representative democracy then the group would have to vote for only one person to make a decision and then the group will follow the "leader" choice althought it goes against the majority of what the group wants.
I hope the answer to be useful for you. Regards.
Answer:
is as important to listen critically as it is to read critically. Critical listening is a process for understanding what is said and evaluating, judging, and forming an opinion on what you hear.
Answer:
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
Explanation:
