Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
A) appeasement
is the correct answer
Answer:
Descartes.
Explanation:
René Descartes was a philosopher that introduced the concept that is now known as "Mind-body dualism" and it says that body and mind refers to different entities that are made of different substances.
Descartes was the first philosopher that talked about this by saying that the mind was an immaterial entity that can imagine, think, generate ideas. While the body is a physical entity governed by the laws of physics.
However, he also said that, in a human being, mind and body, although separated from each other, are somehow related and can influence one another.
In this example,<u> Louisa is writing an essay that discusses the concept of dualism (the mind and body are separate but connected parts of a person).</u> As we said before, this concept was first introduced by Descartes and therefore, she should pay attention to Descartes writings.
Answer:
representativeness heuristic
Explanation:
Max, an attorney, is attending a hearing at the federal courthouse. He opens the courthouse door for a young woman with a tattoo on her forearm. When Max enters the room of the hearing, he is stunned to see that the assigned judge is the same woman. Max had applied the representativeness heuristic.
Answer:
sociocognitive
Explanation:
The sociocognitive theory of hypnosis considers the actions as goal-directed. The people under hypnosis act in accordance with what is expected from them. The actions are done from the point of view of the person. Even though the actions of the people are involuntary their behaviors are goal-driven. The goals are set by the person themselves.
Here, Pete says that it is the goal of the people themselves to act like barn animals and so they act accordingly.
Hence, the statement is referring to the sociocognitive theory of hypnosis.
