C a rectangle. brainily says this is too short so I am writing more
Answer:
B. 
Step-by-step explanation:
Rate of change of y with respect to x, can be calculated using any two of the pairs of values of the table, say, (-2, 12) and (0, 3).
Rate of change = 
Let,


Plug in the values
Rate of change = 
This is child's play.
So, basically:
Y=Length of foot
X= Length of your forearm.
This is simple. Your equation is Y=0.860x + 3.302
So, if you have a forearm (x) that is 17 inches long, then plug in x as 17. This leaves you to evaluate for Y.
New equation: Y=0.860(17) +3.302
Work it out, you get: Y=14.62 + 3.302
Work that out, you get: Y= 17.922 inches long.
And of course, Y is the foot.
So, your answer: If the forearm is 17 inches long, then the foot is 17.922 inches long. Simple.
So, part 2:
Rate of change. Well, you need slope then, because that's the same thing.
Y=mx+b, Where m=slope
Your answer turns to be 0.860 inches per length of arm, for rate of change.
Skipping the data, as that's only something you'd know.
Yes, it is indeed a function. There can't be any exponents greater than 1 on the placeholder, and it's obviously not a straight line if you plug it in.
So yeah, it's a function.
~Hope this helps m8
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a statistics teacher taught a large introductory statistics class, with 500 students having enrolled over many years.
Mean = 78 and std dev =10
Next time, sample size n was reduced to 25
For smaller sample size the mean was found to be = 83
The teacher wanted to know if teaching a smaller class was more effective and students performed better
ie comparison of two means of two samples should be done with different sample sizes but same teacher.
Hence hypothesis should be:

where x denotes the I sample and Y the second with 25 students.