Answer:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31551/31551c10b3e22430ce20c60ed264675e5529eac0" alt="n=4.1mol"
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, we can use the ideal gas equation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bc7d/2bc7d4a5c5af5dd900cb2375f305c4c3f6f91c34" alt="PV=nRT"
So we know the temperature, pressure and volume, therefore we can easily compute the required moles as shown below:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63c0d/63c0dc42c976301cbffc492a41318fbeedc86091" alt="n=\frac{PV}{RT}=\frac{2.0atm*101L}{0.082\frac{atm*L}{mol*K}*600K} \\\\n=4.1mol"
Best regards.
Answer:- data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9d97/b9d9732884c22e2b84620a57119ff202e9d4be7f" alt="KCl"
Explanations:- Lattice energy depends on two factors, charge and size.
High charge and small size gives higher lattice energy where as low charge and bigger size gives lower lattice energy.
in LiCl, NaCl and KCl, the anion is same and also the charges for Li, Na and K are also same. The deciding factor here is the size of cations. Since the size increases as we move down a group, the order of size of these three atoms is Li<Na<K.
The order of lattice energy is exactly opposite as it's increases as the size decreases.
Now, if we look at magnesium chloride and strontium chloride then again the anion is common but the metals have higher charge as compared to the alkali metals(Li, Na and K). So, lattice energy values must be higher for these two compounds. If we compare Mg and Sr then size of Mg is smaller and so the lattice energy would be greater for this.
Hence, the increasing order of lattice energy is
.
Answer:
(3R,4R)-4-bromohexan-3-ol
Explanation:
In this case, we have reaction called <u>halohydrin formation</u>. This is a <u>markovnikov reaction</u> with <u>anti configuration</u>. Therefore the halogen in this case "Br" and the "OH" must have <u>different configurations</u>. Additionally, in this molecule both carbons have the <u>same substitution</u>, so the "OH" can go in any carbon.
Finally, in the product we will have <u>chiral carbons</u>, so we have to find the absolute configuration for each carbon. On carbon 3 we will have an "R" configuration on carbon 4 we will have also an "R" configuration. (See figure 1)
I hope it helps!
Answer:
The correct answer is - 29.45 / 100 x 25.6 = 7.5392 grams
Explanation:
It is given in the question that in 100 gms of CaSO4 there are 29.45 grams of Ca present and there is 25.6 gram of total CaSO4 sample present, So, to calculate the exact value of calcium in this given sample is:
mass of Ca = total amount of sample*percentage of calcium in sample /100
M of Ca =25.6*29.45/100
M of Ca = 7.5392 grams
Thus, the correct procedure is given by 29.45 / 100 x 25.6 = 7.5392 grams