Answer:
338
Step-by-step explanation:
because it right and i said so
Answer:
The simplest answer is

The reason how I got that is because to divide fractions, you have to turn them improper. Once you've done that, you then can multiply it by using the reciprocal of the second fraction. Once they are rearranged, multiply all the numerators by each other. do the same with the denominators and form a new fraction.
Answer:
whenever you're multiplying terms that have exponents you multiply the coefficients and add their exponents:
Step-by-step explanation:
I think the answer to your first question should be:
30a²b - 30ab²
Your second answer is good
whenever you're multiplying terms that have exponents you multiply the coefficients and add their exponents:
for example, 6a²b³c x 2abc = 6(2)(a²)(a)(b³)(b)(c)(c)
= 12a³b⁴c²
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 400
p = 12.5% = 0.125
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of women belonging to union , x = 52
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
The null hypothesis sates that 12.5% of U.S. workers belong to union and the alternate hypothesis states that there is a increase in union membership.
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.3812
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.
Uhhh that doesn’t seem possible but then again i forgot simple math lol