1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rasek [7]
2 years ago
8

Jerome is writing a letter to his principal to identify issues in the school and propose ideas for how to fix them. What organiz

ational structure should he use?
A.
cause-effect
B.
problem-solution
C.
spatial
D.
order of importance
Social Studies
1 answer:
Paladinen [302]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B.  Problem-solution.

Explanation:

In the given scenario, Jerome is emphasizing the issues of the school. This means that in his letter to the principal, he will be talking about the issues that he finds with the school. Moreover, he will propose plans to fix such problems/ issues.  

So, he will use the structural organization of problem-solution where he will list the problems and also suggest solutions.

Thus, the correct answer is option B.

You might be interested in
I just feel like saying something
saw5 [17]
Yes, and i hope that you have nothing but good luck in your years of living. i wish you the best
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The public health officer from long beach complains to you about the dreaded pacific pox. the health officer says, "if people ca
Fudgin [204]
The correct answer is that the case fatality rate of the Pacific Pox must be high.

A case fatality rate is the ratio of deaths due to a certain disease (throughout the duration of the disease in question). In this scenario, since there are no survivors left, the proportion of deaths among the people who had this disease is obviously rather high. 
8 0
2 years ago
Benefits and Disadvantages of free economy
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

Advantages

1. A free market economy gets rid of a significant amount of red tape.

Because there is much less government interference in a free market economy, the levels of bureaucracy are significantly lower. The absence of red tape and complex rules reduces the administrative costs that companies face when developing or marketing goods and services. Since the expenses are lower on the development side, customers can benefit by spending to access more innovative products.

This advantage also makes it possible for organizations to put extra money toward other endeavors, including new research and development opportunities.

2. The free market provides more freedom to innovate.

A free market economy enables organizations to become innovative when imagining new ideas. That means the products and services that become available to the average person have more long-term value to consider. Entrepreneurs aren’t dependent on government agencies to tell them what to do or how to develop new products or services that the public needs.

It is up to each company to study consumer demand, popular trends, and basic needs to provide the best value promise possible. This process creates a higher level of competition in each industry, allowing customers to decide who is the best and deserves their money.

3. Customers always drive transactions in a free market economy.

Organizations in a free market economy have the ability to pursue profit in whatever way they choose. That means any goods and services that are not profitable will usually not receive any attention. Customers make the final determination as to whether an idea will succeed or fail, which means they are the judge and jury for each company.

Disadvantages

1. Profit is always the motive for success in a free market economy.

The primary objective of every business in a free market economy is to earn as much profit as possible. Most situations will see an organization deciding to sacrifice worker safety, compromise on environmental standards, and act without ethics because no controls are in place to govern their behavior. The ends will always justify the means when it comes to the survival of a company in this economy.

Even with a partial free market economy in place, we’ve seen numerous examples throughout history of this disadvantage. Companies like WorldCom and Enron attempted to mislead their customers and government regulators, while the incident on Deepwater Horizon proved to be one of the most significant environmental disasters in U.S. history due to cost-cutting measures like the use of sub-standard cement.

2. Market failures can create severe recessions and ongoing economic consequences.

If a free market economy begins to lose control, then the consequences that happen as an outcome can be quite severe. Two specific incidents in the United States created long-term financial hardships for families: the Great Depression in the 1930s, and the Great Recession from the real estate market crash in 2008. Failures can devastate the lives of millions of households, resulting in lost income, unemployment, and homelessness.

The reason for this disadvantage is a lack of control over profit-seeking behavior. Instead of creating investments that provide slow and steady gains, short-term profits are often the priority in a free market economy. Highly-leveraged assets, loose credit, and no government intervention create a higher risk of failure.

3. A free market economy can provide limited product choices.

Organizations in a free market economy don’t pursue the development of products unless there is a profit potential available. That means limitations in the range of goods and services offered to consumers can exist locally, nationally, or internationally. This disadvantage can impact specific groups of customers more than others based on household income and other factors.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Sexual harassment from other inmates is a reason why an inmate may be placed into
tatyana61 [14]
Segergrarion
The hole
Differnt cell block
All can apply just depends on what inmate moves
6 0
2 years ago
Undercover operations are costly and time-consuming and should be used with extreme care. In which of the following situations w
solmaris [256]

The correct answer is D) When other investigation methods are available.

Undercover operations are costly and time-consuming and should be used with extreme care. In which of the following situations would it be ineffective to conduct an undercover operation?  Answer: When other investigation methods are available.

Undercover operations are very special, costly, and involve key people that are well-prepared to act with discretion and to mo swiftly to advance in the operation. It requires a lot of intelligence work and handling critical information. That is why is one of the last options to choose. It is better to start with other methods of investigation. If these methods fail or fall short, then, the undercover operation is the option.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ciara believes that working women are happier than women who do not work. she predicts that women who work for at least ten year
    8·2 answers
  • Bill is a great college athlete and can play several sports. Last week, his family and friends from home attended the game to wa
    7·1 answer
  • Immigrants in the early twentieth century used what to help them learn the culture in North America?
    7·1 answer
  • Rommell is studying for her final exam in Introduction to Art History. To do this, Rommell is putting information into her memor
    12·1 answer
  • What happens to people who live under a terror regime for a long period of time? Should people adapt to a terror regime? Explain
    10·1 answer
  • In the late 1800s, how did Excelsior Works differ from Standard Oil?
    13·1 answer
  • How do archaeologists learn about people from the past?What do they do​
    5·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP I NEED HELP ASAP PLZ
    11·1 answer
  • What characteristic of the Middle colonies helped with trading?
    10·1 answer
  • This is for my exam:
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!