Answer:
Explanation:
M(s) → M (g ) + 20.1 kJ --- ( 1 )
X₂ ( g ) → 2X (g ) + 327.3 kJ ---- ( 2 )
M( s) + 2 X₂(g) → M X₄ (g ) - 98.7 kJ ----- ( 3 )
( 3 ) - 2 x ( 2 ) - ( 1 )
M( s) + 2 X₂(g) - 2 X₂ ( g ) - M(s) → M X₄ (g ) - 98.7 kJ - 2 [ 2X (g ) + 327.3 kJ ] - M (g ) - 20.1 kJ
0 = M X₄ (g ) - 4 X (g ) - M (g ) - 773.4 kJ
4 X (g ) + M (g ) = M X₄ (g ) - 773.4kJ
heat of formation of M X₄ (g ) is - 773.4 kJ
Bond energy of one M - X bond = 773.4 / 4 = 193.4 kJ / mole
Magnetic moment (spin only) of octahedral complex having CFSE=−0.8Δo and surrounded by weak field ligands can be : Q
To answer this, the Crystal Field Stabilization Energy has to be calculated for a (d3 metal in both configurations. The geometry with the greater stabilization will be the preferred geometry. So for tetrahedral d3, the Crystal Field Stabilization Energy is: CFSE = -0.8 x 4/9 Δo = -0.355 Δo.
[Co(CN)64-] is also an octahedral d7 complex but it contains CN-, a strong field ligand. Its orbital occupancy is (t2g)6(eg)1 and it therefore has one unpaired electron. In this case the CFSE is −(6)(25)ΔO+(1)(35)ΔO+P=−95ΔO+P.
The crystal field stabilization energy (CFSE) (in kJ/mol) for complex, [Ti(H2O)6]3+. According to CFT, the first absorption maximum is obtained at 20,3000cm−1 for the transition.
To learn more about crystal field stabilization energy visit:brainly.com/question/29389010
#SPJ4
Some people may say the python is not that big of an issue,but when they see how much of a disaster the release of the python can cause,they would probably stop trying to challenge this idea
10 because you divide 200 by 20
<h2>
✏28 neutrons are in vanadium.</h2>
<h2 /><h2 /><h2 /><h2 /><h2>
❤XxMrprathamxX13❤</h2>
