I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
question one b
question 2 i think a
3 d
4 c
5 not sure but wanting to say d
6 letter b
7 not sure
8 idk
9 i have no idea
You are who you are because of your enviorment. It depends if your in a healthy environment or a toxic one which changes your act. (Hope this helps)
Answer:
option (B)
Explanation:
Young's modulus is defined as the ratio of longitudinal stress to the longitudinal strain.
Its unit is N/m².
The formula for the Young's modulus is given by

where, F is the force applied on a rod, L is the initial length of the rod, ΔL is the change in length of the rod as the force is applied, A is the area of crossection of the rod.
It is the property of material of solid. So, when the 10 wires are co joined together to form a new wire of length 10 L, the material remains same so the young' modulus remains same.
Increasing mass increases kinetic energy. This can be seen in the equation KE = 1/2 (m) (v)^2
If you found this helpful, please brainliest me!