<span>Radiochemical dating is the answer!</span>
An organism adapting to its environment leads it to be more ‘equipped’ for survival.
Competition is when other species fight for the same resources that another species needs. Also, it would produce offspring with these adaptations.
An example (to help you better understand);
A blue jay has great eyesight, strong wings, and sharp beak. (Better adapted organism) Another blue jay has great eyesight, weak wings, and dull beak. (The competitor/unadapted)
Both birds find the same food source and are now competing for it. The first bird has sharp beams, which is better for breaking, and ‘chomping’ the seeds/food. The second bird would struggle to consume its food (seed) unless it’s worms.
So which one is better adapted? The first blue jay.
And i hope this helped show how competition can be reduced.
I’m pretty sure it is Sediments I think
The option that is an example of the "ethical dilemma" of creating and destroying human embryos is option A: Some people..."believe an embryo has the same moral standing as a human being?"
<h3>What moral dilemmas do embryonic stem cells present?</h3>
The infinite differentiation potential of iPSCs, which can be used for human cloning and pose a risk for the creation of human embryos and human-animal chimeras, is the center of the current ethical debates surrounding stem cell-based therapies.
However, due to the fact that it involves the killing of human embryos, hESC research is morally and politically contentious. The controversy over abortion has a strong connection to the issue of when human existence begins in the United States.
Learn more about human embryos from
brainly.com/question/2625384
#SPJ1
