Answer:
The correct approach is Option B (Peer Review).
Explanation:
- Rather made reference to someone as a scientific peer-review, it encourages the specialist who has not been essential to the study team to analyze the study objectively and pointed out everyone's mistakes. It serves as major self-regulation for scholars and aims to make the publishing process somewhat credible. Hence, the solution to this issue is Peer Examination.
- Funding organizations rarely have the capabilities to recognize out mistakes, whereas definitive analysis is a method of study that helps to make a definitive statement. The gathering of data is simply a process of scientific study.
Other approaches do not apply to the example mentioned. Although the one mentioned is right.
Protons and neutrons are in the center of the atom, making up the nucleus. The charge on the proton and electron are exactly the same size but opposite. Neutrons have no charge.
<span>The answer is: C. The amount of water in the hydrosphere remains constant.
</span>The hydrosphere denotes the entire water available worldwide in lakes and streams, subsurface water, the ice of glaciers, and water vapor in the atmosphere. The water cycle is the process that converts liquid water to atmospheric water vapor (and vice versa) throughout the world.
I can't tell because I can't see the picture but it seems like
