2,375 is the answer because 720 divided by 30 is 24 and your dividing by 24 so 57,000 divided by 24 is 2,375
Answer:
Statement A is correct about Sam's box and whisker plot.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given a box plot and we are asked to find out true statement according to the box plot.
Since we know data represented by box plot is divided in four equal parts.
Upon looking at our box plot we can see that our data is symmetric. It's median is 15, which means half the math assignments have less than 15 problems and half of the math assignments have more than 15 problems.
Interquartile range represents 50% values of data and it is the difference between upper quartile and lower quartile. IQR is not affected by outliers.
Upon substituting given values from box plot we get,
From IQR we can conclude that half of the assignments contained 15 problems or fewer.Therefore, option A is the correct choice.
<span>The
content of any course depends on where you take it--- even two courses
with the title "real analysis" at different schools can cover different
material (or the same material, but at different levels of depth).
But yeah, generally speaking, "real analysis" and "advanced calculus"
are synonyms. Schools never offer courses with *both* names, and
whichever one they do offer, it is probably a class that covers the
subject matter of calculus, but in a way that emphasizes the logical
structure of the material (in particular, precise definitions and
proofs) over just doing calculation.
My impression is that "advanced calculus" is an "older" name for this
topic, and that "real analysis" is a somewhat "newer" name for the same
topic. At least, most textbooks currently written in this area seem to
have titles with "real analysis" in them, and titles including the
phrase "advanced calculus" are less common. (There are a number of
popular books with "advanced calculus" in the title, but all of the ones
I've seen or used are reprints/updates of books originally written
decades ago.)
There have been similar shifts in other course names. What is mostly
called "complex analysis" now in course titles and textbooks, used to be
called "function theory" (sometimes "analytic function theory" or
"complex function theory"), or "complex variables". You still see some
courses and textbooks with "variables" in the title, but like "advanced
calculus", it seems to be on the way out, and not on the way in. The
trend seems to be toward "complex analysis." hope it helps
</span>
Given: m ∠3 = m ∠4
To Prove: ∠1, ∠2 are supplementary .
Proof : m ∠3 = m ∠4 ( Given) ------------(1)
m<2 + m< 3 = 180 degrees ( <2 and <3 form a linear pair). ----------(2)
m< 4 = m<1 (Vertical angles are equal) -----------(3).
Substituting, m<4 =m<1 in (1), we get
m ∠3 = m ∠1.
Now, substituting m ∠3 = m ∠1 in (2), we get
m<2 + m< 1 = 180 degrees.
Sum of m <1 and m<2 is 180 degrees.
Therefore,<em> ∠1, ∠2 are supplementary by the defination of supplementary angles.</em>
Answer:
B I am 100% sure
Step-by-step explanation:
