Answer:
true
Explanation:
this the nucleus is located at the centre and contains protons and neutrons
Temperature. The other three dont have anything to do with determining climate
Answer:
bc it was a universal explosion and It started the future
Explanation:
FACTS
Answer:
The final temperature of both objects is 400 K
Explanation:
The quantity of heat transferred per unit mass is given by;
Q = cΔT
where;
c is the specific heat capacity
ΔT is the change in temperature
The heat transferred by the object A per unit mass is given by;
Q(A) = caΔT
where;
ca is the specific heat capacity of object A
The heat transferred by the object B per unit mass is given by;
Q(B) = cbΔT
where;
cb is the specific heat capacity of object B
The heat lost by object B is equal to heat gained by object A
Q(A) = -Q(B)
But heat capacity of object B is twice that of object A
The final temperature of the two objects is given by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ff15/6ff154b76a55b848dfd3784152be42142803e813" alt="T_2 = \frac{C_aT_a + C_bT_b}{C_a + C_b}"
But heat capacity of object B is twice that of object A
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f2ef/7f2ef7f62c9cacd296ed498f707d14a5ba1288e0" alt="T_2 = \frac{C_aT_a + C_bT_b}{C_a + C_b} \\\\T_2 = \frac{C_aT_a + 2C_aT_b}{C_a + 2C_a}\\\\T_2 = \frac{c_a(T_a + 2T_b)}{3C_a} \\\\T_2 = \frac{T_a + 2T_b}{3}\\\\T_2 = \frac{300 + (2*450)}{3}\\\\T_2 = 400 \ K"
Therefore, the final temperature of both objects is 400 K.
Momentum is a product mass and velocity. If a certain object posses a kinetic energy, then it should have a momentum since it is moving which has a velocity. However, if the object is at rest and only has potential energy, then it would not have momentum. So, for the first question the answer would be yes, an object can have energy without having any momentum. For the second question, every object whether it is moving or at rest, possess some energy, potential for an object at rest and kinetic for an object that is moving. Thus, the answer would be no, an object having momentum would always have energy.