All categories

2 years ago

Write an equation for the vertical translation.

Mathematics

1 answer:

Lubov Fominskaja [6]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

y=-2/9 x – 9

Step-by-step explanation:

It really is simple translation because this is written in y=mx+b, where b is the given y-intercept. From there, just subtract what is needed to go down or add what is need to go up.

y=-2/9 x – 7 – 2

.:y=-2/9 x – 9

You might be interested in

Is 28 rational or irrational

Sonja [21]

28 is a rational number

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

On a hiking trip LaShana notes that she hiked about 12 kilometers every 4 hours. If she continues at this rate' how many kilomet

scoray [572]

Answer:

18 Kilometers

Step-by-step explanation:

If you divide 12 by 4 you get 3, so she is going about 3 kilometers an hour. Add 3 for each hour, and you get 18 kilometers in 6 hours.

8 0

3 years ago

Is (-3,11) a solution to the system of equation shown below.

natita [175]

No, when you substitute it into the first equation for x and y it does not equal 36 this it's not a solution

(-3)-(3)(11)=36
-3-33=36
-36 =/ 36

8 0

3 years ago

Get the product using FOIL method: (x+2)(x+3)

emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

x² + 5x + 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Foil means first, outside, inside, last

First: (x+2)(x+3)

x × x = x²

Inside: (x+2)(x+3)

x × 3 = 3x

Ouside: (x+2)(x+3)

2 × x = 2x

Last: (x+2)(x+3)

2 × 3 = 6

adding them together:

x² + 3x + 2x + 6 = x² + 5x + 6

8 0

2 years ago

A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an

Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

Predicted value

Active value Fraudulent Non-fraudulent

Fraudlent 30 58

non-fraudulent 32 920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of $\left( {b + c} \right)(b+c)$ and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, $30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040$

The error rate is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}$

The percentage is $0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65$

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and $\left( {a + b} \right)(a+b)$ .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91$

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and $\left( {c + d} \right)(c+d)$ .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64$

6 0

2 years ago