Since the scientists found a fossil from a modern day badger from the Holocene geologic epoch, the badger would be mostly the same, as this is the most recent, and still on going geologic epoch, starting from little less than 12,000 years ago. If the scientist wants to find a fossilized remains of earlier badgers, thus of their ancestors from the Pleistocene epoch, than the scientist should dig deeper. Not a lot deeper though, as the layers of rock from the Pleistocene are just bellow the layers of rock from the Holocene, as the Pleistocene is the second youngest geologic epoch, being the predecessor of the Holocene.
Answer:
There are 
Explanation:
In this problem, we need to find the number of molecules in 
mol of 
.
The molar mass of is 
No of moles = mass/molar mass
We can find mass from above formula.
Also,
No of moles = no of molecules/Avogadro number
Hence, there are
Hi there!
The <span>major accomplishment of the Apollo missions was to successfully land Americans on the Moon and to return them safely to Earth. One major reason for this was to establish a way for us to travel to other celestial bodies safely so we could research them and study how they work or to see if they are inhabitable.
-Your friend, ASIAX</span>
In descriptive investigations, we still haven't formed any hypothesis yet so we seek information by asking question.
It's not repeatable because repeating the questions over and over again without any clue about what we want to seek is completely waste of time.
Hope this helps xox :)
No. The number of a protons is not equal to it's atomic weight, instead it is equal to the 'atomic number'
