1. Roman women could hold office- False
2. Roman women could own property- True
3. Roman women could divorce their husbands- True
Explanation:
Roman women has less political and social status than their men. Roman women can not hold office. They can not occupy a higher position in office. Though who belong to elite society they some time hold a position in social hierarchy.
Roman women can bought property and could be its owner also. Roman women have the power to authorize her property in single handle. Roman women have the right to divorce her husband. If a couple is not happy in their marriage then the female partner can take the decision to be separated from her husband.
Answer:
India like the United States operates a bicameral Legislative which means
they have 2 Houses involved in the creation of Laws.
The <u>Lok Sabha</u> is the lower house of Parliament and comprises of 543 seats.
The<u> Rajya Sabha</u> is the upper house and has 245 seats.
The National Capital Territory of Delhi is represented by 7 seats in the Lok Sabha and 3 seats in the Rajya Sabha.
The constituents represented in the Lok Sabha are;
- Chandni Chowk
- North East Delhi
- East Delhi
- New Delhi
- North West Delhi
- West Delhi
- South Delhi
The 3 seats in the Rajya Sabha are held by;
- Narain Dass Gupta
- Sushil Kumar Gupta
- Sanjay Singh
<span>At the completion of supinator action, the palm is turned "</span>anteriorly".
In human anatomy, the supinator is a wide muscle which is present in the back compartment of the lower arm, bended around the upper third of the radius. Its work is to supinate the lower arm.
Answer:
Is the agreement between two or more countries to come in contact with business with each others
Answer:
Which of the following is not correct? B. Because many of the poorest families receive in-kind transfers, more families have lower standards of living when compared to poverty rates based on income.
Explanation:
To understand this, we have to analyze the options:
a) It is correct that many inequality instruments are only based on income. But not all of them, that is why many are perfectly used. So it's not the correct answer, but it's correct.
c) it is also true because it is again recalling the income as a wrong medium to measure equality. Even though this time is in the form of loans or savings.
d) it is true because many times people don't have permanent ways of income but temporary. So this biases the data.
b) is not correct because in-kind transfers have been an effective way to fight poverty and they don't delimit a family to a lower standard. This is not a known fact, but an assumption based on a belief. Because it could be true or not, based on the posture of the family of study and the use they assign to the transfers.
