Complete Question
Complete Question is attached below
Answer:
a)Option B
b)Option B
Explanation:
a)
Without any confirmation it will be utterly wrong to conclude that high power voltage is the reason for the elevated cancer cases
Therefore
Option B
b)
The High Concentration of cells volume in a part of the Body is what causes Cancer
Therefore
Option B
Answer:
Waning gibbous.
Explanation:
The same side that you see in one place of the continent at night, you will also see in other place on earth, regardless of the hemisphere. There is however a slight difference, but not ecognizable to the human eye thus Waning Gibbous will also be seen everywhere else in the night sky that night.
I'm assuming your question refers to the train travels 81 km in 2 hours, as in that's the total distance covered versus the speed for those 2 hours, whereas the 90 km in 2 hours the second time around is the total distance not speed I would assume.
Now... if it was going 81 km for the first 2 hours and 90 km for the second 2 hours then the average speed would be the mean of these numbers, with that being 85.5 km. Though, I doubt that's your question.
With that said, 81 km covered by 2 hours and 90 km covered by 2 more hours. To acquire the km an hour average, we'll have to divide the distance by how many hours it traveled:
81 / 2 = 40.5
90 / 2 = 45
Meaning the train was going 40.5 km an hour for the first 2 hours and 45 km an hour for the second 2 hours. Now, to find the mean:
40.5 + 45 = 85.5 / 2 = 42.75
In-case you were wondering, the mean is the sum of all the numbers in a set, divided by the total amount of numbers in that set, take for instance:
3, 5, 9, 2, 1, 5. -> There are 6 numbers in this set.
3 + 5 + 9 + 2 + 1 + 5 = 25 -> 25 is the sum of these numbers.
25 / 6 = 4.2 (estimated) -> 4.2 is roughly the mean or average between the original set.
Anyhow, with that aside the average speed between this I would believe would be 42.75 km an hour. I hope that helps, have a great rest of your day! ^ ^
| | Ghostgate (Alter) | |
B4 the tackle:
<span>The linebacker's momentum = 115 x 8.5 = 977.5 kg m/s north </span>
<span>and the halfback's momentum = 89 x 6.7 = 596.3 kg m/s east </span>
<span>After the tackle they move together with a momentum equal to the vector sum of their separate momentums b4 the tackle </span>
<span>The vector triangle is right angled: </span>
<span>magnitude of final momentum = √(977.5² + 596.3²) = 1145.034 kg m/s </span>
<span>so (115 + 89)v(f) = 1145.034 ←←[b/c p = mv] </span>
<span>v(f) = 5.6 m/s (to 2 sig figs) </span>
<span>direction of v(f) is the same as the direction of the final momentum </span>
<span>so direction of v(f) = arctan (596.3 / 977.5) = N 31° E (to 2 sig figs) </span>
<span>so the velocity of the two players after the tackle is 5.6 m/s in the direction N 31° E </span>
<span>btw ... The direction can be given heaps of different ways ... N 31° E is probably the easiest way to express it when using the vector triangle to find it</span>