1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
polet [3.4K]
3 years ago
5

ANSWER ASAPPP In​ 2000, the population of St. Louis was​ 346,904, and it decreased to​ 319,257 in 2010. If this population decre

ase were modeled by an exponential decay​ function, what value would represent the​ y-intercept? Explain your reasoning.
The​ y-intercept should be ________. This is the population for the ______(first/last( known year of data. The year ______________ acts as 0 on the graph of the exponential function.
Mathematics
1 answer:
mart [117]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The​ y-intercept should be 346,904. This is the population for the first (first/last( known year of data. The year 2000 acts as 0 on the graph of the exponential function.

Step-by-step explanation:

I just did it on my homework and it said that my answer is right

You might be interested in
26y⁴+39y³-13y² by (-13y²)​
yKpoI14uk [10]
I Have The Answer But It Will Cost You
6 0
3 years ago
I need someone to solve this problem for me please
Amiraneli [1.4K]
First, solve the area of the entire large rectangle (28)(45) = 1260
Next, find the area of the chunk that is cut out (11)(15) = 165
- we know the width is 15 because 45 - 6 - 24
Subtract the cut out piece from the overall rectangle 1260 - 165 = 1095
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A group of friends spent 1, 0, 2, 3, 4, 3, 6, 1, 0, 1, 2, and 2 hours online last night. What are the 1st and 3rd quartiles for
charle [14.2K]
1 and 3 i just did the math tell me if i’m wrong
8 0
3 years ago
URGENT !!! ANSWER NUMBER 7, right answer will get the brainlest!!!!
ra1l [238]

Answer:

Most likely wrong but i thinkkk C

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
1 QUESTION-30 POINTS<br> QUESTION PINNED BELOW
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

The scale is not reasonable.

Step-by-step explanation:

The painting is 48 inches  by 120 inches

The scale is 1 inch = 4 inches

Divide the painting size by 4

48/4 = 12 inches

120/4 = 30 inches

We would need paper that is

12 inches by 30 inches

Our paper is 12 inches by 24 inches

It is too small.  The scale is not reasonable

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • |−6.24|+|−2.47|=what
    6·1 answer
  • Solve the inequality:-3x-4/7 &gt;5
    10·1 answer
  • Avyd is selling raspados .75 and elote for 1.25. Jasmin spent $8.25 to buy a total of 9 items. How many raspados did she buy?​
    14·1 answer
  • gina rented a moon walk for 5 hours at total cost of $230. lori rented the same moon walk for 2 hours at a total cost of $125. t
    12·1 answer
  • You’re about to get on a plane to Seattle. You want to know if it’s raining. You call 3 random friends who live there and ask ea
    10·1 answer
  • Consider the function ƒ(x) = x2. Which of the following functions shifts ƒ(x) downward 5 units and to the right 3 units?
    5·1 answer
  • Solve for y.<br> 3= y+7 divided by 3 <br><br> Y=
    13·2 answers
  • Planteamiento algebraico
    10·1 answer
  • Riddle: how can you take 2 from 5 and leave 4?
    15·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST AND 5 STARS TO CORRECT ANSWERS ONLY! PTS TO WHO PARTICIPATES!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!