The ch4 molecule exhibits hydrogen bonding.
This statement is false. A CH4 molecule do not have a hydrogen bonding instead it has dipole dipole attraction.
Hydrogen bonding occurs when a hydrogen atom is covalently bonded to an N, O, or F atom.
This would be a true statement. A hydrogen bond is present when an atom of hydrogen shares electrons with O, N or F atom.
A hydrogen bond is equivalent to a covalent bond.
This is a false statement. A hydrogen bond is an intermolecular force of attraction while covalent bond is a intramolecular force. So, they would mean different things.
a hydrogen bond is possible with only certain hydrogen-containing compounds.
This would be true. Without the presence of an hydrogen atom definitely there would be no hydrogen bond.
a hydrogen atom acquires a partial positive charge when it is covalently bonded to an f atom.
This would be true since a HF is a polar molecule.
Tell your teacher. They'll know what to do and it's best to report it to them.
Answer:
The answer to your question is: 6.8 g of water
Explanation:
Data
2.6 moles of HCl
1.4 moles of Ca(OH)2
2HCl + Ca(OH)2 → 2H2O + CaCl2
MW 2(36.5) 74 36 g 111 g
73g
1 mol of HCl ---------------- 36.5 g
2.6 mol -------------- x
x = (2.6 x 36.5) / 1 = 94.9 g
1 mol of Ca(OH)2 -------------- 74 g
1.4 mol --------------- x
x = (1.4 x 74) / 1 = 103.6 g
Grams of water
73 g of HCl ------------------ 36g of H2O
94.9 g ------------------- x
x = (94.9 x 36) / 73 = 46.8 g of water
In terms of a deeper scientific reason, I am not sure, but the basic reason is quite simple. "Mud" tends to look like a mix between a solid, dirt, and a liquid, water or some other liquid. Since it is, in fact, a cross between a solid and a liquid, it has properties of both. It has certain physical and visual properties that only a solid would have, such as texture and opaqueness, but it also has physical properties of a liquid. Since it leans more towards the liquid side than the solid side, we say mud "flows" rather than saying that it "rolls" or "bounces".