Binomial distribution formula: P(x) = (n k) p^k * (1 - p)^n - k
a) Probability that four parts are defective = 0.01374
P(4 defective) = (25 4) (0.04)^4 * (0.96)^21
P(4 defective) = 0.01374
b) Probability that at least one part is defective = 0.6396
Find the probability that 0 parts are defective and subtract that probability from 1.
P(0 defective) = (25 0) (0.04)^0 * (0.96)^25
P(0 defective) = 0.3604
1 - 0.3604 = 0.6396
c) Probability that 25 parts are defective = approximately 0
P(25 defective) = (25 25) (0.04)^25 * (0.96)^0
P(25 defective) = approximately 0
d) Probability that at most 1 part is defective = 0.7358
Find the probability that 0 and 1 parts are defective and add them together.
P(0 defective) = 0.3604 (from above)
P(1 defective) = (25 1) (0.04)^1 * (0.96)^24
P(1 defective) = 0.3754
P(at most 1 defective) = 0.3604 + 0.3754 = 0.7358
e) Mean = 1 | Standard Deviation = 0.9798
mean = n * p
mean = 25 * 0.04 = 1
stdev = 
stdev = 
= 0.9798
Hope this helps!! :)
I’m think it is the median
Complete Question:
Dustin is buying carpet for the living room. If the length of the room is 21 ft and the width
is 11 ft, how many square feet of carpet does he need to buy?
Answer:
231 ft²
Step-by-step explanation:
==>GIVEN:
Length of room (L) = 21 ft
Width of room (W) = 11 ft
==>REQUIRED:
Square feet of carpet to be bought = area of the rectangular room
==>SOLUTION:
The room to be covered with carpet is rectangular in shape. In order to ascertain the square feet of carpet to be bought, we need to calculate the area of the room by using the formula for area of rectangle.
Thus, area of rectangle (A) = Length (L) × Width (W)
A = 21 × 11
A = 231 ft²
Square feet of carpet to be bought = 231 ft²
Here, we have to examine the equation of the straight line which is denoted by: y = m x +c where "m" is the slope which represents the steepness and c is the y-intercept
Here, the two linear functions have the same slope "m" and the same y-intercept "c". When both these are the same, the two linear functions are representing the same straight line.
Therefore, Jeremy is correct in his argument.
Step-by-step explanation:
g(x) = -f(x+1) + 2
f(x) is first reflected across the x-axis and then translated 1 unit to the left and 2 units up.
