This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
You have walked in late to class, and your psychology professor is explaining how one personality theorist sees personality as a relatively stable set of potential responses to various situations. You know immediately that your professor is talking about the theories of
a. J.ulian Rotter.
b. B. F. Skinner
c. Albert Bandura
d. John Watson.
Answer:
You know immediately that your professor is talking about the theories of
a. J.ulian Rotter.
Explanation:
J.ulian B. Rotter was born in Brooklyn, New York, in 1916. He was a psychologist who developed influential theories such as social learning theory and locus of control. According to Rotter, personality can be described as a relatively stable set of potentials responses to different situations. However, stable does not mean unchangeable. To Rotter, if you can change the way a person thinks, you can also change the way they respond or behave.
NOTE: I had to spell J.ulian like this because, for some reason, Brainly interprets it as a bad word. That also happens with other similar names such as J.uliet.
Answer:
The answer is explained below.
Explanation:
Edward F Diener is an American psychologist. He is known for conceptualising the aspect of happiness which can be empirically measured, it is called Subjective Well Being (SWB). He is a leading researcher in positive psychology. According to him, there are five factors that are important for happiness: Money, Positive thinking styles, Social relationships, adaptation, society and culture.
<span>In recent years white prejudice has increased in rural parts of the US, while in more densely-populated urban areas white prejudice has declined. Studies show that simply by moving to a move urban and racially diverse city, white people become less likely to prejudge others based on race. This suggests that racism is perhaps due to lack of exposure to people of other races and is a form of experiential ignorance. The reasons for white prejudice seem to be caused mostly by the spread of misinformation and hate speech, where white supremacist figureheads will blame any number of problems on any race or group that they perceive as "other" or "outsiders". The internet has given these outspoken individuals an international soapbox from which to spout their racist rhetoric, which may have caused an increase in the intensity of believe seen among some groups of white prejudiced Americans. However, the internet has also given a platform for many more rational thinkers who preach tolerance, acceptance, and the value of diversity in society. This is considered mainstream academic thought in the US today, which was not the case just 50 years ago. In that regard, white prejudice has decreased as a function of the overall population of the US. Similar trends have been observed in other countries which were previously predominantly white and have recently seen a much larger spike in racial and ethnic diversity. For example, in Germany, white prejudice has starkly decreased over the past 100 years. Less than a century ago, a large number of Germans were participating in race-based genocide on their own soil. Today, Germany has a culture of acceptance and semi-open borders. In 2016, Germany's leader Angela Merkel opened Germany's borders to thousands of refugees escaping Syria. The majority of these refugees were non-white, and were accepted by the German people. This scenario would not have been possible in German culture 50 years ago.</span>
