I think its [B]
Personally i would say [B] only because If you are looking beyond the car in front of you..... then what if the car in front of you throws on breaks... you would hit them in the butt because you weren't paying attention to the car.
And majority of the time if your looking in the lanes beside you then you are most likely trying to get in that lane.
Answer:
![F_T=6k\frac{Q^2}{L}\hat{i}+10k\frac{Q^2}{L}\hat{j}=2k\frac{Q^2}{L}[3\hat{i}+5\hat{j}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F_T%3D6k%5Cfrac%7BQ%5E2%7D%7BL%7D%5Chat%7Bi%7D%2B10k%5Cfrac%7BQ%5E2%7D%7BL%7D%5Chat%7Bj%7D%3D2k%5Cfrac%7BQ%5E2%7D%7BL%7D%5B3%5Chat%7Bi%7D%2B5%5Chat%7Bj%7D%5D)
Explanation:
I attached an image below with the scheme of the system:
The total force on the charge 2Q is the sum of the contribution of the forces between 2Q and the other charges:
![F_T=F_Q+F_{3Q}+F_{4Q}\\\\F_T=k\frac{(Q)(2Q)}{R_1}\hat{i}+k\frac{(3Q)(2Q)}{R_2}\hat{j}+k\frac{(4Q)(2Q)}{R_3}[cos\theta \hat{i}+sin\theta \hat{j}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F_T%3DF_Q%2BF_%7B3Q%7D%2BF_%7B4Q%7D%5C%5C%5C%5CF_T%3Dk%5Cfrac%7B%28Q%29%282Q%29%7D%7BR_1%7D%5Chat%7Bi%7D%2Bk%5Cfrac%7B%283Q%29%282Q%29%7D%7BR_2%7D%5Chat%7Bj%7D%2Bk%5Cfrac%7B%284Q%29%282Q%29%7D%7BR_3%7D%5Bcos%5Ctheta%20%5Chat%7Bi%7D%2Bsin%5Ctheta%20%5Chat%7Bj%7D%5D)
the distances R1, R2 and R3, for a square arrangement is:
R1 = L
R2 = L
R3 = (√2)L
θ = 45°
![F_T=k\frac{2Q^2}{L}\hat{i}+k\frac{6Q^2}{L}\hat{j}+k\frac{8Q^2}{\sqrt{2}L}[cos(45\°)\hat{i}+sin(45\°)\hat{j}]\\\\F_T=k\frac{2Q^2}{L}\hat{i}+k\frac{6Q^2}{L}\hat{j}+k\frac{8Q^2}{\sqrt{2}L}[\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\hat{i}+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\hat{j}]\\\\F_T=6k\frac{Q^2}{L}\hat{i}+10k\frac{Q^2}{L}\hat{j}=2k\frac{Q^2}{L}[3\hat{i}+5\hat{j}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F_T%3Dk%5Cfrac%7B2Q%5E2%7D%7BL%7D%5Chat%7Bi%7D%2Bk%5Cfrac%7B6Q%5E2%7D%7BL%7D%5Chat%7Bj%7D%2Bk%5Cfrac%7B8Q%5E2%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7DL%7D%5Bcos%2845%5C%C2%B0%29%5Chat%7Bi%7D%2Bsin%2845%5C%C2%B0%29%5Chat%7Bj%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CF_T%3Dk%5Cfrac%7B2Q%5E2%7D%7BL%7D%5Chat%7Bi%7D%2Bk%5Cfrac%7B6Q%5E2%7D%7BL%7D%5Chat%7Bj%7D%2Bk%5Cfrac%7B8Q%5E2%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7DL%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%7B2%7D%5Chat%7Bi%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%7B2%7D%5Chat%7Bj%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CF_T%3D6k%5Cfrac%7BQ%5E2%7D%7BL%7D%5Chat%7Bi%7D%2B10k%5Cfrac%7BQ%5E2%7D%7BL%7D%5Chat%7Bj%7D%3D2k%5Cfrac%7BQ%5E2%7D%7BL%7D%5B3%5Chat%7Bi%7D%2B5%5Chat%7Bj%7D%5D)
and the magnitude is:
the direction is:
Answer:
i) 24.5 m/s
ii) 30,656 m
iii) 89,344 m
Explanation:
Desde una altura de 120 m se deja caer un cuerpo. Calcule a 2.5 s i) la velocidad que toma; ii) cuánto ha disminuido; iii) cuánto queda por hacer
i) Los parámetros dados son;
Altura inicial, s = 120 m
El tiempo en caída libre = 2.5 s
De la ecuación de caída libre, tenemos;
v = u + gt
Dónde:
u = Velocidad inicial = 0 m / s
g = Aceleración debida a la gravedad = 9.81 m / s²
t = Tiempo de caída libre = 2.5 s
Por lo tanto;
v = 0 + 9.8 × 2.5 = 24.5 m / s
ii) El nivel que el cuerpo ha alcanzado en 2.5 segundos está dado por la relación
s = u · t + 1/2 · g · t²
= 0 × 2.5 + 1/2 × 9.81 × 2.5² = 30.656 m
iii) La altura restante = 120 - 30.656 = 89.344 m.
Answer:
Yes, it is reasonable to neglect it.
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, a single molecule of oxygen weights 32 g (diatomic oxygen) thus, the mass of kilograms is (consider Avogadro's number):
After that, we compute the potential energy 1.00 m above the reference point:
Then, we compute the average kinetic energy at the specified temperature:
Whereas 
stands for the Avogadro's number for which we have:
In such a way, since the average kinetic energy energy is about 12000 times higher than the potential energy, it turns out reasonable to neglect the potential energy.
Regards.
Answer:
80m, assuming g=10m/s^2
Explanation:
40m/s will be reduced to 0m/s in 4 seconds. 4 seconds x 40m/s would be 160m up, but you will only get half of that because you decelerate linearly to 0m/s. This leaves you with 4 x 20 = 80m.
